PAEDIATRIC ALTERED CONSCIOUS LEVEL GUIDELINE

HOME

AIMS

SCOPE

CLINICAL QUESTIONS

EVIDENCE-BASED SEARCH

DELPHI PROCESS

RECOMMENDATIONS

COMMENTS

PARTICIPANTS

DRAFT GUIDELINE

 

 

MINUTES

 

Minutes of meeting 17th December, 2003

 

  1. Present at meeting: Dr Maria Atkinson                 (fellow)

                                          Dr Richard Bowker               (fellow)

                                          Gordon Denney                     (lay representative/sponsor)

                                          Dr Monica Lakhanpaul         (guideline methodologist)

                                          Sr Sue Shipston                    (nurse practitioner A+E)

Prof. Terence Stephenson   (chair)                          

Dr William Whitehouse         (paed. neurologist)

 

Apolologies from:      Dr David Bond                      (general paediatrician)

                                    Dr Jim Bonham                     (clinical chemist)

                                    Dr Ken Brown                        (general practitioner)

                                    Dr Ian Maconochie                (paed. A+E)

                                    Dr Stephanie Smith              (paed. A+E)

                                    Dr Harish Vyas                      (PICU)

                                    Dr John Walter                      (metabolic medicine)

 

Not yet appointed:     General A+E physician

                                    Patient representative

 

 

  1. Background to the guideline

 

It was explained that a grant from the National Reyes Syndrome Foundation had been awarded to develop an evidence-based problem orientated guideline, with the aim that a standard approach to the management of altered consciousness, and especially the rare metabolic encephalopathies, could be achieved to improve the outcome of these patients.

 

  1. Scope of the guideline

 

After discussion, it was agreed that this should be a modular guideline consisting of two parts.

The first module will be limited to the management in the first hour or so after presentation. The second module will start after first line investigations have been processed.

 

The scope for module one of the guideline:

 

What is the aim of the guideline (module one)?

 

The guideline aims to standardise and improve the management and investigation of children presenting with an altered conscious level in the first hour after arriving at hospital.

 

Who is the guideline (module one) written for?

           

The intended users for this part of the guideline are first line admitting staff in hospital (i.e. Accident and Emergency senior house officers {A+E SHOs}, registrars and nurses, or SHOs and registrars admitting to an acute paediatric ward).

 

Which patients should be included in the guideline (module one)?

 

Any paediatric patient presenting with or developing an altered conscious level of unknown cause will be included in the guideline.

Excluded from the guideline will be those infants presenting immediately after birth and having not yet been discharged from hospital. This excludes infants with neonatal encephalopathy, which encompasses a large number of causes beyond the scope of the guideline.

Also excluded are patients above the age limit for admission to the local paediatric department.

Patients who are being treated for a known cause of their altered conscious level will be excluded from the guideline. This exclusion criteria was included to filter off some of the causes of altered conscious level which are secondary to traumatic brain injury (e.g. obvious signs of head injury) or systemic illnesses where altered consciousness may be the end stage (e.g. airway obstruction, severe pneumonia, hypovolaemic shock). It was agreed that providing evidence-based management guidelines for all these causes where altered consciousness is not primarily neurological in origin would create an unusable document in terms of size. However, it was felt that advice should be included in the guideline as to what these causes may be, how they could be picked up in the “Advanced Paediatric Life Support” primary survey and where guidance may be found (e.g. NICE guidelines CG24 “Head injury”). This advice should also address the need to re-examine the guideline if by treating an “obvious cause” the clinical course or recovery is atypical (e.g. a head injury secondary to a fall may have been precipitated by a primary encephalopathy).

The exact nature of the filtering process for those patients whose altered conscious level is not primarily neurological in origin has not been determined.

 

There was a discussion about other symptoms or signs which could be included as part of the entry criteria (e.g. focal neurological signs, seizures, altered behaviour) to ensure that the early stages of encephalopathy are not missed. However, it was agreed that in a problem-based guideline only one problem or presenting symptom/sign can form the entry criteria. If more than one symptom is included then the guideline becomes unmanageable (as each individual problem would need its own guideline) and more like a diagnosis-based guideline (the summation of features forms a diagnosis at the beginning of the guideline).

 

The definition of altered consciousness has been left open for the time being until the systematic literature search / formal consensus process has taken place.

 

What are the end points for the guideline (module one)?

 

The guideline will end when first line investigations have been sent, or are requested, and initial treatments have been started within the first hour or so after presentation. Within the first hour very few laboratory results will be back and the treatment options will be limited. The treatment options available for first line staff include anticonvulsants, intubation and ventilation, dextrose infusion, antibiotics, acyclovir, fluid and inotropic support, bicarbonate, and mannitol. More complicated treatments are unlikely to be available within the first hour after presentation, or would not be started until further test results are reviewed (again unlikely to be available within the first hour or so).

Further management decisions will therefore be covered in the second module after further test results are available and second line investigations have been considered.

 

The scope for module two of the guideline:

 

What is the aim of the guideline (module two)?

 

The guideline aims to standardise and improve the management and investigation of children in hospital with an altered conscious level, the cause of which remains unknown after first line investigations have been reviewed.

 

Who is the guideline (module two) written for?

 

The intended users for this part of the guideline are more experienced paediatric staff, paediatric intensivists, and metabolic medicine physicians.

 

Which patients should be included in the guideline (module two)?

 

All children whose altered conscious level remains undiagnosed following review of first line investigations.

 

What are the end points for the guideline (module two)?

 

There are many second line investigations available for this group of patients from electroencephalograms to mitochondrial enzyme assays. Some of these results will be available immediately and others will take weeks to come back. Treatment options also vary from acute intracranial pressure reducing measures to long term dietary management. The end points for the second module of the guideline was discussed and agreed to a general principle of appropriate tests being sent and appropriate treatment plans in place, but that the underlying diagnosis may not have been established by the end of the guideline (indeed “undiagnosed coma” may be the final clinical description for some of these patients).

 

  1. Components of the guideline

 

As well as the 2 modules of the guideline, it was suggested that an information pack for hospital staff on how to take the various samples would be useful, and a patient / parent information leaflet would be produced. A programme for audit will be included in the guideline. The modular nature of the guideline would lend itself to being developed into a care pathway, which may be achieved by the end of the project.

 

  1. Consensus process

 

After discussion it was agreed that a single Delphi panel would be used for both modules of the guideline. It was discussed that two different Delphi panels could be used for the two modules of the guideline - the thinking behind this being that there will be some very specialist knowledge required for the second module. However, panel members who feel they lack specialist knowledge for some questions will be able leave the answer blank (self selecting themselves out of the panel, but still contributing to the consensus process such as language of recommendations, etc.). The Guideline development group felt that having a single Delphi panel would improve the rigour of the guideline development process and include rather than exclude vital stakeholders.

 

  1. Stakeholders and dissemination

 

Stakeholder groups need to be identified and comments on the guideline development invited from them. Involving stakeholder groups will improve the rigour of the guideline development process and also alert these groups to the existence of the guideline, thereby helping with dissemination. Other strategies to help disseminate the guideline should include a web-site, writing to the Royal colleges of the stakeholder groups, an article in CHERUB, local hospital magazines/news publications, and a public open day (as NICE / SIGN hold) half way through the development process.

Richard Bowker will write a progress report / publicity document for circulation.

 

 

Next meeting will take place at 2.00pm on Monday 23rd February, 2004 in the Postgraduate Education Centre of Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham.

 

 

            Minutes written up by Dr Richard Bowker, 22nd December, 2003

 

 

MEETINGS