Accessibility statement for Xerte

Accessibility statement for Xerte

This accessibility statement applies to Xerte version 3.9 and later. This statement has been produced from the Xerte accessibility statement.

AbilityNet has advice on making your device easier to use if you have a disability. 

How accessible this website is

Xerte has been designed from the outset to maximise accessibility and personalisation for end-users. If an author uses the default settings in Xerte toolkits, and employs the basic good practices enabled by the WYSIWYG editor and default dialogue boxes, then the end-user will benefit from a high level of native accessibility.

Range of media types

 

Magnification and reflow

 

Orientation and navigation

 

Known accessibility issues

Games

The three currently included Games Page types are not accessible to screen reader users, but only the Word search is inaccessible to a sighted keyboard user. It is important content creators consider "equivalence of experience". Highly visual activities are great for deaf or dyslexic users but will not create a good experience for blind users no matter how "accessible" they are. In some cases alternative resources provide a more positive experience than an experience that is technically accessible but cognitively alien.

Colour contrasts and custom themes

The default XOT themes meet WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility requirements. However, colour contrasts can be compromised in the following circumstances:

  • the author sets an inappropriate background image beneath text. Xerte provides an end user accessibility option to remove background images but authors should select background images with caution so that there is still sufficient contrast and legibility,
  • the author uses controls available via the wysiwyg editor and/or custom CSS to apply colours or other styles that impact accessibility,
  • the author chooses an alternative theme, or develops their own that impacts accessibility

Mobile compatibility

Xerte provides authors with a wide range of 'page types' from which to choose, including different interactions and various types of media, and mostly this should all be technically compatible with modern mobile devices especially tablets and laptops. However some interactions may not be practical on smaller hand-held devices unless authors consider and adopt a mobile first approach. e.g. limit the amount of draggable items so that a drag and drop interaction remains practical on a small screen device. Where necessary authors should test and adapt their resources with small screen compatibility in mind.

What to do if you cannot access parts of this website

If you experience any issues accessing content developed in Xerte, please email learning-technologies@nottingham.ac.uk

The University offers an Alternative Formats Service (AFS).

Reporting accessibility problems with this website

If you find any problems not listed on this page or think we’re not meeting accessibility requirements, email learning-technologies@nottingham.ac.uk

To contact the Xerte developers with any accessibility related issues, use the Xerte accessibility forum or use the Xerte project’s GitHub.

Accessibility-related issues being worked on can be found on the Xerte GitHub repository via the Accessibility tag.

Enforcement procedure 

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) is responsible for enforcing the Public Sector Bodies (Websites and Mobile Applications) (No. 2) Accessibility Regulations 2018 (the ‘accessibility regulations’).

If you’re not happy with how we respond to your complaint, contact the Equality Advisory and Support Service (EASS)

Contacting us by phone or visiting us in person 

Our team is based on the University Park Campus. You can contact us at Learning-Technologies@nottingham.ac.uk

Technical information about this website’s accessibility

University of Nottingham is committed to making its website accessible, in accordance with the Public Sector Bodies (Websites and Mobile Applications) (No. 2) Accessibility Regulations 2018. 

Compliance status 

Xerte Online Toolkits is compliant with Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1, level AA except for the following circumstances:

  • specific specialist page types noted below
  • authors fail to use appropriate guidelines
  • authors fail to anticipate the specific needs of their audience

Non-accessible content 

The content listed below is non-accessible for the following reasons.

Non-compliance with the accessibility regulations

Interactivities

Some interactivities require users to place text in a sequence or to match labels with target areas. Currently, when a Screen reader user picks up a label and tabs through the target areas, they cannot get any feedback as to whether they already dropped a label on that target area. This is an issue with Matching texts and Timeline/matching pairs.

This issue and any others identified after this statement was last updated have been added to the developer work stream on the Xerte Github under the Accessibility tag.

Timed content

The timing and appearance of text on the Bullets page cannot be changed by the user. This fails 2.2.2 (Pause, Stop, Hide), however, users are not disadvantaged in any way.

Errors reported by automatic auditing tools

If you use automated accessibility auditing tools on Xerte resources like Wave, Axe, Lighthouse etc you may still find errors reported or alerts identified. Xerte use these tools too and are still working through some of the genuine issues. You can see a list of these via the Xerte GitHub repository via the Accessibility tag.

It's also important to note that due to the dynamic way that Xerte works some issues reported by automated tools may be incorrect or certainly not likely to adversley impact users. e.g. any pages/themes that still report contrast errors are easily resolved for users by their option to switch to the high contrast theme.

Xerte also have additional improvements planned and underway which deal with issues that aren't reported by the automated tools but can impact on the usability and accessibility of resources created, especially the usefuleness of certain interactions for screen reader users. See the Xerte accessibility guidance page for additional information about the differences between technical compliance and pedagocial context.

If you discover any accessibility issues, you can report these to Xerte via their accessibility forum or GitHub issues list.

Non-accessible and disproportionate burden 

Interactivities and Games

Some interactivities are visually focused. They add value for sighted users but are very challenging for blind users. These include the following pages: Image viewer, Sortable Grid, Hangman, Memory game and Word search.

Discussions with the developer team and accessibility specialists suggest that the value obtained by blind users in doing these activities is minimal in relation to the opportunity cost of diverting volunteer effort from other developments that would add more value to more users.

JMOL Viewer

This third-party 3D molecule viewer is fully keyboard accessible but the technology does not currently exist to meaningfully render the infinite viewing permutations in an alternative format. A blind user would have a better experience with an alternative physical model.

Media PDF Viewer

The embedded PDF in this page type is accessible to keyboard and screen reader users and can be magnified but the viewer does not allow the PDF to reflow when magnified. Xerte explored the issues with PDF reflow and discovered that even Adobe’s own specialist Reader software cannot consistently provide a reliable reflow experience.

Xerte consider it a disproportionate burden to attempt to fix this issue and advise users who need magnification and reflow to download the PDF locally and try using Adobe Reader (View > Zoom > Reflow) or Microsoft Word (View > Web layout) to achieve reflow.

Non accessible and out of scope

Any third-party content embedded in Xerte which we do not control or fund (for example Flickr content, YouTube content) is beyond the scope of the PSBAR regulations.

How we tested this website

This statement was prepared by members of University of Nottingham Libraries working with the Xerte development team and based on the Government Digital Services Basic test, supported by both manual and automated testing with accessibility checking tools such as WAVE, SiteImprove, AXE and Lighthouse.

A sample of around 60% of the page types were tested using Windows Narrator and/or NVDA. Deeper dive testing was also commissioned by a technical accessibility expert on a sample of pages containing widely used web elements.

What we’re doing to improve accessibility 

The Xerte Project takes accessibility seriously and the high levels of native accessibility in the tools demonstrate a long-standing commitment to accessible design.

Xerte aims to provide best-of-breed accessibility, and the project works with accessibility experts, and with users with a wide range of differing requirements, to inform the development of Xerte

Preparation of this accessibility statement 

This statement was prepared on 19 October 2020. It was last updated on 20 October 2020.

University of Nottingham

University Park
Nottingham, NG7 2RD

telephone: +44 (0) 115 951 5151
fax: +44 (0) 115 951 3666
email: Contact us