Department of American and Canadian Studies

 

Image of Matthew Pethers

Matthew Pethers

Associate Professor in American Literary and Cultural History, Faculty of Arts

Contact

Expertise Summary

My research interests are in the literary, intellectual and cultural history of America between the early eighteenth century and the Civil War, and particularly: matters of form and aesthetics; book history and periodical culture; the origins of American Romanticism; ideas of labor and knowledge during the antebellum period; early American drama; transatlantic cultural relations.

Teaching Summary

I am currently and have recently supervised PhD students working on: Ralph Waldo Emerson; John Jay; American loyalism and emotions history; racial liminality in nineteenth-century American fiction;… read more

Research Summary

I am currently working on a book project entitled The Imagined Archive: Fragments, Forgeries, Fictionalities and the Rise of the American Historical Novel, 1740-1840.

This monograph offers the first comprehensive analysis of the genealogy of the American historical novel, tracing its origins to a substantial but so far overlooked body of writings that established many of this later genre's concerns and techniques. While standard accounts of the historical novel tend to posit it as emerging fully formed with the work of Walter Scott and James Fenimore Cooper in the early nineteenth century, The Imagined Archive looks to a longer tradition of "forged fragments" as one that was attempting to fuse imaginative reconstruction and empirical detail much earlier. Unlike the much-discussed Romantic fragments of writers like Coleridge and the Schlegels, "forged fragments" were often carefully designed to resemble genuinely incomplete historical works and became particularly revealing focal points for wide-ranging debates about cultural authenticity, national memory, and literary identity during the late Enlightenment. Considering both the domestic creation and transatlantic importation of these forged fragments, which variously claimed to be from ancient Rome, pre-Christian Scotland, Biblical times, medieval Europe, or Indigenous cultures, my book recovers a largely forgotten corpus of historical fiction that both predates and complicates the conventional critical narratives around this genre.

Drawing on the overlapping, and increasingly contentious, engagement of theologians, classicists, ethnographers, archaeologists, and philosophers with the problem of the elusiveness of the past I examine how the generically flexible and epistemologically ambiguous form of the invented historical fragment raises a cluster of related questions about the development of historical fiction before the age of Scott and Cooper. What does the forged fragment tell us about the role of fictional reconstruction and imaginative inference in understanding ancient cultures during the Enlightenment? In what ways were forged fragments used to explore the unbreachable fissures between these ancient cultures and modern ideas, values, or events, and either celebrate or critique Enlightenment notions of progress? And in particular how did forged fragments capitalize on and compensate for a historiographical landscape in which archives were still patchy and embryonic and subjective antiquarian techniques had not yet given way to modern notions of scientific "objectivity"?

In taking American manifestations of the forged fragment for its corpus, The Imagined Archive considers a particularly fraught and revealing set of instances of this literary form's negotiation between different temporal and intellectual registers, given the pressing concern of writers in the colonies and early republic to find a "usable past" for their young civilization, their deep but conflicted cultural affinity with Anglo-European conceptions of classical and neoclassical "order," and the tensions inherent in the Revolution's advocacy of social equality in theory but not practice. Moreover, by focusing on the varied career of the invented historical fragment in America over the decades around the turn of the nineteenth century I chart cultural and geographical territory that has barely been explored before, offering: an alternative genealogy of the historical novel that radically revises the current Lukacsian paradigm; the first study of the idea and practice of literary forgery in early America; and a fresh account of the literary fragment that acknowledges both the distinctively pseudo-historical forms it took in the New World and the creative adaptations American writers wrought on the example of notorious fakers like James Macpherson and Thomas Chatterton.

I also have a long-term research interest in the aesthetics and temporality of textual serialization in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Treating seriality as a diverse phenomenon incorporating magazine instalments, fascicule volumes, republished editions and unofficial sequels and abridgements, as well as a wide rage of genres, I have explored how various American writers used strategies of narrative extension and interruption to establish the heteroglossic scope, mimetic realism and affective investment central to the development of American literary culture, and continue to work on this topic. An essay called "The Early American Novel in Fragments: Writing and Reading Serial Fiction in the Post-Revolutionary United States," which is drawn from this still-evolving project, can be found in New Directions in the History of the Novel, eds. Patrick Parrinder, Andrew Nash and Nicola Wilson (Palgrave, 2014), and more recent work in this vein has appeared in Nineteenth Century Studies and The Routledge Companion to the British and North American Literary Magazine.

I am more generally interested in addressing the conceptualization, dissemination and contestation of "the novel" in colonial America in future work, drawing on both established transatlantic methodologies and emerging work on the idea of "fictionality" in order to make a case for the significant pre-history to our familiar narratives of the post-revolutionary "rise of the American novel." I have very briefly sketched out some of the parameters for this project in a contribution to a roundtable on "21st Century Studies in the Early American Novel" that I edited for the Journal of American Studies, and that also included pieces by Duncan Faherty, Thomas Koenigs, Karen Weyler, Ed White, Sian Silyn Roberts and Cathy N. Davidson. In addition, I have co-edited (with Thomas Koenigs) a special issue of Early American Literature - 56.3 (2021) - on the topic of fictionality that reflects some of the trends and approaches I am interested in developing here. A podcast for Early American Literature in which we discuss the conception and goals of this special issue can be found here: https://eal.uky.edu/podcast

Additionally, I have co-edited a collection of essays - The Part and the Whole in Early American Art, Literature and Print Culture - with Daniel Diez Couch which appeared with Bucknell University Press in April 2024, and I am currently working, with Hilary Emmett and Len von Morze, on editing Volume 2 of The Collected Writings of Charles Brockden Brown, which is contracted to appear from Bucknell University Press in 2024. More information on this volume and the Brown edition as a whole can be found here: http://brockdenbrown.cah.ucf.edu/volumes.php

I would be keen to work with students on any subject relating to the literary, intellectual and cultural history of America between 1600 and 1900, and would also welcome inquiries from students more broadly interested in literary professionalism, periodical culture, the history of the book, American verse, aesthetic theory, transatlantic exchange, or the history of information systems.

Selected Publications

  • PETHERS, M., 2017. Transportation Narratives: Servants, Convicts, and the Literature of Colonization in British America. In: PAUL LAUTER and NICHOLAS COLES, eds., The History of American-Working Class Literature Cambridge University Press. 7-24
  • PETHERS, M., 2016. Dead Letters and the Secret Life of the State in Nineteenth Century America. In: BERNIER, C. M., NEWMAN, J. and PETHERS, M., eds., The Edinburgh Companion to Nineteenth-Century American Letters and Letter-Writing Edinburgh University Press. 136-51
  • PETHERS, M., BERNIER, C. M. and NEWMAN, J., 2016. Introduction: Epistolary Studies and Nineteenth-Century American Letters and Letter-Writing. In: PETHERS, M., BERNIER, C. M. and NEWMAN, J., eds., The Edinburgh Companion to Nineteenth-Century American Letters and Letter-Writing Edinburgh University Press. 11-28
  • PETHERS, M., 2014. The Secret Witness: Thinking, and Not Thinking, About Servants in the Early American Novel. In: ANDREW LAWSON, ed., Created Unequal: Class and the Making of American Literature Routledge. 40-55

Department of American and Canadian Studies

University Park
Nottingham, NG7 2RD

Contact us