However, they were slightly less optimistic about the effect that it may have on the UK economy as a whole with just over one-third (41 per cent) predicting it could have a negative impact.
While opinions seemed split on whether David Cameron’s move would isolate the UK, individual comments showed an appreciation of the difficult political backdrop against which the Prime Minister is making decisions on the UK’s future in Europe.
One business person commented: “I don't think the UK had any other option. The UK is constantly being railroaded into decisions without any reference to democratic processes and into structures/policies that are often not working. At some point we had to have the courage to say 'no' and significant issues of sovereignty were at stake. The treaty issue was one for those in the euro rather than outside it.”
Another added: “My concern is that the UK will now be blamed for all the European ills. I am also concerned that obstacles will be put in the way of UK exports. However, I do not see that David Cameron had much choice and that, in the short term, we may escape the worst of the crash when Greece defaults. Perhaps is it the least worst option.”
However, others voiced concerns over the Government’s policy on Europe, branding it as ‘short-sighted’ and demonstrating an outdated ‘little Englander’ mentality.
A view summed up by one respondent who said: “A position of ‘splendid isolation’ does not feel helpful, particularly as the government are also extending cuts in spending. Where is the drive for economic stimulation? It feels like business is being held back both at home and abroad now by a government that is only focussed on protecting banking.”
The views of business people were echoed by those of advisers responding to the sister survey the UK Business Adviser Barometer (UKBAB), with 70 per cent agreeing that the Government’s stance would affect their clients’ businesses neither positively nor negatively, while 44per cent said that it may have a negative impact on the UK economy more generally.
However, their comments do reflect worries about the future if the UK continues to move away from its European neighbours.
One adviser said: “I feel UK businesses will suffer as SMEs are not very good at exporting and with Europe being our nearest and largest market, a feeling of negativity towards us by European buyers will do us harm.”
Another said: “The bigger question, however, is what direction will the economy of Europe take in the next 1–2 years. My clients who sell into Europe are really worried about a recession or worse in Europe, not sure what happens to the City or changes to bank regulation.”
Another adviser voiced their concerns, adding: “There is a risk that in the long term those outside the EU will perceive the UK as being at the periphery of the single market and at risk of isolation by the other EU member states. This could adversely impact upon investment decisions.
“It is understandable that in the short term the government continues to focus attention on the City because fears around a further banking collapse. However, in the medium and long-term the government will have to focus its attention on rebalancing the economy away from financial services. It cannot do this without the UK being at the centre of Europe.”
The UK Business Barometer (UKBB) and the UK Business Adviser Barometer (UKBAB) provide a snapshot of how small and medium-sized businesses are coping with the current state of the economy and aim to uncover the key issues affecting the small business market. Operating over the web means that results can be rapidly generated and the surveys have unique software that enables results to be processed and posted on their respective websites immediately they arrive.
More information, including results and analyses, can be found on the web at www.ukbb.ac and www.ukbab.ac. Businesses and advisers wishing to contribute as panellists on the project should visit the appropriate Business Barometer website to register.
To follow us on LinkedIn search for ‘UK Business Barometer’.
— ends —
Notes to editors: The University of Nottingham, described by The Sunday Times University Guide 2011 as ‘the embodiment of the modern international university’, has award-winning campuses in the United Kingdom, China and Malaysia. It is ranked in the UK's Top 10 and the World's Top 75 universities by the Shanghai Jiao Tong (SJTU) and the QS World University Rankings. It was named ‘the world’s greenest university’ in the UI GreenMetric World University Ranking 2011, a league table of the most environmentally-friendly higher education institutions.
The University is committed to providing a truly international education for its 40,000 students, producing world-leading research and benefiting the communities around its campuses in the UK and Asia. Impact: The Nottingham Campaign, its biggest ever fund-raising campaign, will deliver the University’s vision to change lives, tackle global issues and shape the future. For more details, visit: www.nottingham.ac.uk/impactcampaign
More than 90 per cent of research at The University of Nottingham is of international quality, according to the most recent Research Assessment Exercise, with almost 60 per cent of all research defined as ‘world-leading’ or ‘internationally excellent’. Research Fortnight analysis of RAE 2008 ranked the University 7th in the UK by research power.
The University’s vision is to be recognised around the world for its signature contributions, especially in global food security, energy & sustainability, and health. The University won a Queen’s Award for Higher and Further Education in 2011, for its research on global food security. More news from the University at: www.nottingham.ac.uk/news