Highlights
Climategate, Nuttgate, opposition to GM crops, the MMR and BSE health scares: over the last 30 years high profile political crises surrounding the integrity of research, the status of expert advice and governance of new technologies have challenged the authority of science; increased tensions in the relationship between government and science; and tested public trust in scientific research. In principle, a solution is to make the practice, use and assessment of science more public, open, transparent and democratic. However, this also poses major challenges to science, politics and public participation.
The overall aim of the programme is to answer the following research questions:
- What is meant by making science more public, open or transparent?
- Who are ‘the public’ and how are they constituted?
- What might ‘public science’ mean for the authority and independence of science and the capacity of publics to engage with science?
- What are the political implications of making science more public and how does this relate to issues of legitimacy and transparency in politics and policy making?
The research team is collaborating with colleagues across The University of Nottingham — in Engineering, Biomolecular Sciences, Pharmacy, Computer Sciences and Physics — and beyond. The programme focuses on three main topics: food, agriculture and animals; energy and environment; and health and social policy.
Prior to the start of the programme on 1 May 2012, we:
- Launched a programme website
- Launched a programme related blog, which has tackled issues such as knowledge and society, hype and trust, science and uncertainty, science and magic and many more