PAEDIATRIC ALTERED
CONSCIOUS LEVEL GUIDELINE |
|||||||||
Round one
11. Raised
intracranial pressure
Statement 11a (Raised intracranial pressure recognition and initial management)
Intracranial pressure is related to cerebral perfusion pressure by the following equation:
Cerebral perfusion pressure = mean arterial pressure – intracranial pressure
%
Agree |
% Disagree |
Result |
93.9% |
6.1% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
PICU |
It is CPP = mean BP – mean ICP |
Neuro |
This is an estimate of the CPP used in practice. It may not represent the CPP at the microvascular level. |
Statement 11b
Raised intracranial pressure can be defined clinically by the presence of 2 or more of the following signs:
Reduced conscious level (being Unrousable or GCS < 9)
Abnormal pattern of respiration (hyperventilation, irregular ventilation or apnoeas)
Abnormal pupils (unilateral or bilateral dilated pupils or unreactive pupils)
Abnormal posture (decorticate or decerebrate posture or complete flaccidity)
Abnormal doll’s eye (oculocephalic) response or caloric (oculovestibular) response
%
Agree |
% Disagree |
Result |
83.3% |
6.7% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Paed |
Bradycardia and hypertension could be included ? |
|
There are other explanations for these findings |
Neuro |
These do not DEFINE ICP but certainly make it likely |
ED P |
Seems sensible, although I don’t know how many of the criteria you need |
Neuro S |
Several of the above could theoretically occur in brainstem ischaemia in the absence of raised ICP but this is unlikely in the paediatric age group |
Endo |
1. and one or more of the others |
Paed |
however not all signs may be present and clinical situation, eg trauma, may complicate picture |
PICU |
Abn of range of eye movement esp increase gaze may be more subtle early sign of raised ICP |
Paed |
caloric response not to be done by inexperienced doctors |
Statement 11c
If raised intracranial pressure is suspected, then the child should undergo the following treatments:
(i) Position the patient’s head in the midline
% Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
86.7% |
0% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
ED P |
May help, won’t cause harm! |
ED |
I’m not sure of the relevance of this – am I missing something? Isn’t that where we usually position the head?? |
Paed |
Don’t know that but makes sense |
PICU |
may not always be easy to sustain |
Statement 11c
If raised intracranial pressure is suspected, then the child should undergo the following treatments:
(ii) Angle the patient head up at 20 degrees above the horizontal
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
88.5% |
0% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
PICU |
20-30 degrees |
ED |
If the child has sustained trauma, the spine should remain immobilised, ie the whole trolley should be at a slope of 20 degrees to the horizontal, not angled midway |
ED |
Outside my expertise and usually managed by PICU / Anaesthetists |
PICU |
10-30 deg advised from variety – difficult in active patient |
(iii) Sedate, intubate and ventilate the patient to maintain the PaCO2 between 4.0 and 5.0 kPa
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
64% |
24% |
Discussed
in round 2 |
Position |
Comments |
Paed |
Need lower co2 |
ED |
I don’t know if there is a standard regarding sedating and ventilating. |
Neuro |
Not in all patients, certainly not in all suspected patients |
Radiol |
Yes but don’t know gas levels |
Neuro S |
4.0 – 4.5 would be my ideal |
Endo |
4.0-4.5? |
Paed |
BUT beware the DKA child with spontaneous pCO2 <2 – an increase to 4 precipitate coning |
PICU |
May be required. IC decision. PaCO2 4-4.5 initially |
(iv) Sedate, intubate and ventilate the patient to maintain the PaCO2 below 4.0 kPa
%
Agree |
% Disagree |
Result |
29.2% |
66.7% |
Excluded |
Position |
Comments |
Paed |
But should also define lower limit ? 3kPa to avoid people overdoing it |
|
hyperventilate only if other measures have failed to bring ICP down |
Neuro |
There is a danger of causing cerebral ischaemia |
Neuro |
not always necessary, do you want to measure the pressure first? Bolt? |
Paed |
Though this was too low now? |
Neuro S |
Too low risk ischaemia |
Endo |
?above 3.5 ie 3.5-4.5 |
Paed |
BUT beware the DKA child with spontaneous pCO2 <2 – an increase to 4 precipitate coning |
Paed |
occasionally required acutely to reduce pressure |
(v) the patient should be paralysed with muscle relaxing agents
%
Agree |
% Disagree |
Result |
60% |
20% |
Discussed
in round 2 |
Position |
Comments |
PICU |
only if tight control of C02 needed |
Neuro |
Depends on the situation; sometimes appropriate |
Neuro |
not always necessary |
Neuro S |
Not crucial initially |
Endo |
Need to observe movements if possible |
Paed |
in ICU setting |
PICU |
never routinely |
-
(vi) Administer a dose of 1g / kg of intravenous mannitol
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
50% |
19.2% |
Discussed
in round 2 |
Position |
Comments |
|
depends on cause of raised ICP |
Metab |
0.5 Gm/kg IV |
Neuro |
Depends on response to other measures. Often appropriate, but certainly not always necessary |
ED P |
Not sure about dose (?0.5 g/kg) also some units prefer 3% saline |
ED |
If the child has an intracranial bleed amenable to surgical decompression and / or in consultation with a neurosurgical team |
ED P |
If proven, not just suspected |
Neuro S |
0.5g/kg probably adequate |
Paed |
D/W neurosurgeons |
Paed |
only if P.U.s |
PICU |
may be required but not automatically, often used with frusemide if given |
Paed |
I discuss with neurosurgeons/neurologists as various places have different policies |
Neuro |
If not in renal failure and intracerebral haematoma excluded; 0.25-0.5g may work just as well |
(vii) Administer a dose of 5ml / kg of 3% sodium chloride (“hypertonic saline”)
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
25% |
41.7% |
Excluded |
Position |
Comments |
PICU |
if mannitol produced no response |
Neuro |
I don’t think the evidence base is strong enough to routinely recommend hypertonic saline |
ED P |
Cant remember dose |
ED P |
If proven, not just suspected |
Paed |
Never heard of it! |
Neuro S |
Not something I’ve seen used and don’t like the idea |
Endo |
Not in my experience |
PICU |
may be required. not usually both mannitol and 3% saline. duration of bolus if advised needs to be given. some would give over 60 mins other 180 mins |
(viii) Maintenance fluid should be administered at 100% of normal
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
26.9% |
50% |
Discussed
in round 2 |
Position |
Comments |
PICU |
if normal saline used |
Neuro |
Depends upon the volume status of the child and the BP |
Paed |
it should be ideally 2/3 maintenance |
ED |
Depends on intravascular filling and hydration |
ED P |
May get SIADH |
Neuro |
Unless signs of being overloaded |
Metab |
Assuming shock has been treated by this stage… |
Endo |
If shock present? |
PICU N |
Yes, but need a lot more detail regarding why ICP raised |
PICU |
rarely 100% usual about 70% |
Statement 11c
If raised intracranial pressure is suspected, then the child should undergo the following treatments:
(ix) Maintenance fluid should be administered at 70% of normal
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
68% |
12% |
Discussed
in round 2 |
Position |
Comments |
|
Occasinally less depenbding on other factors eg renal function |
Neuro |
Depends upon the volume status of the child and the BP |
PICU N |
need to maintain CPP therefore need to keep fluids at 100% initially |
Paed |
at maximum |
Neuro S |
Old fashioned |
Endo |
But supporting perfusion |
PICU |
usually |
(x) Maintenance fluids should not be hypotonic
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
100% |
0% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Neuro S |
Ideally use saline/saline dex mix |
(xi) Maintenance fluids should be 0.45% saline and dextrose (with 20 – 40mmol/l potassium if required) initially
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
34.8% |
39.1% |
Discussed
in round 2 |
Position |
Comments |
PICU N |
Need more patient details |
Neuro |
Depends upon the fluid status of the child |
(xii) Maintenance fluids should be 0.9% saline (with 20 – 40mmol/l potassium if required) initially
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
62.5% |
16.7% |
Discussed
in round 2 |
Position |
Comments |
PICU N |
Need more patient details |
Paed |
Might need to add glucose especially for younger children |
Neuro |
monitor blood sugars, pending electrolyte results |
ED |
Depends on other local policies ie protocols for glucose/ stage of treatment reached |
(xiii) Arrange for patient transfer to a paediatric intensive care unit
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
93.9% |
3.0% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
PICU N |
If necessary - Need more details |
Neuro |
If intubated and ventilated yes |
Endo |
…with neurosurgical facility |
Paed |
Neurosugical centre with PICU |
PICU |
ideally |
(xiv) Ensure the results of all the core investigations performed
are reviewed, and consider further tests if the cause of the raised
intracranial pressure is not diagnosed. (“core investigations performed” will be defined as the
investigations agreed upon in Statement 7d; “further tests” will be defined as
the investigations agreed upon in statements 7e)
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
100% |
0% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
PICU |
time scale of results being available would help – with 30min reasonable |
Statement 11d
Patients with suspected raised intracranial pressure should
have invasive intracranial pressure monitoring performed if: (the mode of
“invasive intracranial pressure monitoring” will be addressed later)
(i) the patient does not improve after initial intracranial pressure lowering measures have been implemented (“intracranial pressure lowering measures” will be defined by the treatments agreed upon in statement 11c)
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
63.6% |
13.6% |
Excluded |
Position |
Comments |
Paed |
Depends a little on availability |
ED |
seems appropriate but the evidence that monitoring alters outcome does not exist |
Neuro |
It very much depends on the cause of the raised ICP |
ED P |
This would be dealt with by centre we have referred to |
ED P |
If high suspicion |
ED |
Depends on cause |
Endo |
Ideally |
PICU N |
If severe enough – see neuro team |
PICU |
poor indication. no evidence to my knowledge |
(ii) the patient has cerebral oedema on CT scan
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
35% |
35% |
Excluded |
Position |
Comments |
Neuro |
Depends on cause |
ED P |
This would be dealt with by centre we have referred to |
Neuro |
not if patient improves |
PICU N |
neuro team |
Paed |
Neurosurgeon |
Neuro S |
Depends on history/level of GCS/other scan findings eg GCS>10 with focal contusion and oedema may be best woken up to be assessed. Global oedema from asphyxia there may be no point in ICP monitoring a lethal brain injury |
Endo |
Not sure seeing it makes a difference |
PICU |
not an indication |
(iii) the patient is hypertensive (a mean arterial pressure above the 95th centile for age)
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
31.6% |
42.1% |
Excluded |
Position |
Comments |
PICU |
no |
Endo |
As CPP more difficult to assess |
Paed |
Neurosurgeon |
ED P |
Start antihypertensives |
PICU N |
neuro team |
Neuro |
not if patient improves |
Neuro |
I don’t think this is an important criterion for deciding on pressure monitoring |
(iv) the patient has a raised plasma ammonia level
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
14.3% |
42.9% |
Excluded |
Position |
Comments |
PICU N |
neuro team |
Neuro |
dpends on the level…lower ammonia level first |
Paed |
?what |
Neuro S |
Depends on clinical condition |
PICU |
no |
Statement 11e
(i) In the acute setting, the most appropriate method of monitoring intracranial pressure is by inserting :
(a) an intraventricular catheter
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
37.5% |
62.5% |
Excluded |
Position |
Comments |
ED |
I’m no expert but I think these are used |
ED |
allows access to CSF but is technically more difficult and risks further infection |
Neuro |
If the ventricles are dilated, it may be a reasonable approach |
ED P |
Would not be doing this |
Neuro |
Nice in theory – in practice expertise amongst junior neurosurgical staff (and indeed many consultants) minimal |
Metab |
Depends on the setting: this is what we have easiest access to, performed by either a general surgeon, or by a physician-neurologist |
PICU |
CATHETER THAT ALLOWS DRAINAGE OF CSF IS IDEAL |
Neuro S |
Invasive, infection risk, though accurate and allows therapeutic tapping of fluid |
Neuro |
Ventricle are often compressed making insertion difficult |
PICU |
may help esp if spaces drainable |
Neuro |
If the surgeon can get one in… |
Statement 11e
(i) In the acute setting, the most appropriate method of monitoring intracranial pressure is by inserting :
(b) a subarachnoid screw or
bolt
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
56.3% |
31.3% |
Excluded |
Position |
Comments |
ED |
depends on availability of kit and is technically easier |
Metab |
We don’t have easy access to neurosurgery, which isn’t on-site |
PICU |
AS CAN BE PERFORMED BY NEUROSURGEON OR INTENSIVIST ON PICU |
Neuro |
Parenchymal bolt |
ED |
I’m no expert but I think these are used |
Endo |
Only experience I have! |
Neuro |
No data |
Neuro S |
Old fashioned |
PICU |
“usual” method |
(c) an epidural sensor
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
33.3% |
50% |
Excluded |
Position |
Comments |
ED |
potential risk of EDH if clotting is abnormal |
Metab |
Not available to us at this centre |
Neuro |
No data |
Neuro S |
But I think you mean subdural sensor as in Codman neurosensor (epidural placement is very inaccurate |
PICU |
not |
(ii) In the acute setting, the choice of intracranial pressure monitoring device should be determined by the neurosurgeon performing the procedure
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
72% |
0% |
Excluded |
Position |
Comments |
PICU |
most in the |
Neuro |
If he understands the physiology |
Metab |
In consultation with Paed neurol/intensivists and according to their individual experiences |
Neuro S |
Monitoring devices and compatibilities will vary from unit to unit |
PICU |
helped by guidelines! |
Statement 11f
Patients with an intracranial pressure monitoring device in situ must also have invasive blood pressure monitoring to calculate the cerebral perfusion pressure
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
80% |
0% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
PICU |
generally |
Neuro S |
In paediatric age range CPPs are less well researched than in adult |
ED |
Tho’ I have little experience of this I would support this |
Neuro |
This is good practice, but there is on going debate about whether ICP or perfusion pressure should be followed |
Neuro |
This is preferable but not essential |
|
seems sensible, but evidence that ICP monitoring effects outcome is awaited |
Statement 11g
Cerebral perfusion pressure should be maintained above 60 mmHg with the PaCO2 in the normal range
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
76.9% |
0% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
PICU N |
For some patients PaCO2 at the lower end of normal is required to maintain stability |
PICU |
This value is age dependent |
PICU |
DEPENDS ON AGE OF CHILD |
Neuro |
The critical limits of CPP probably vary with age, but are unknown |
Neuro |
No data |
Neuro |
This is an appropriate level in older children but may be too high for younger children. It can be dangerous to drive the heart to hard and it may be better, in some circumstances to accept a lower perfusion pressure (say above 50). Ceratinly the Pa CO2 should be kept normal |
Neuro S |
Reasonable target for older kids. Bob Minns in Edinburgh (Royal Hosp for Sick Children – paed neurology) has recently looked at different targets for ages – I think 50, 55, 60 were the figures he came up with when I last heard him talk at European Soc for Paed Neurosurgery 2004 |
Metab |
This sounds somewhat high to me – we found poor prognosis if <40 – other say norm=50. But best if can be >60 |
PICU |
age dependent (local guide and 1st guess = <1 yr 40; 1-3 yr 50; 3+ 60) |
Statement 11h
To maintain an adequate cerebral perfusion pressure :
(i) inotropic support may be required
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
96.8% |
0% |
Included |
Position |
Comment |
PICU |
usual requirement = not inotrope but inoconstrictor (noradrenaline) |
(ii) further doses of mannitol may be used
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
84% |
0% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Neuro |
Limited by osmality: a specialist (intensivist) decision |
PICU N |
but tend to be used just for crisis management |
Paed |
only once or twice? |
Neuro S |
Within limits – subsequent ones less effective |
PICU |
with careful monitoring |
(iii) further doses of 3% saline may be used
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
69.2% |
15.4% |
Excluded |
Position |
Comments |
Neuro |
a specialist (intensivist) decision |
PICU |
especially by slow infusion to target Na/Osmol – 160/320 |
(iv) hypothermia should ideally be used in a controlled clinical trial setting only
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
88.9% |
5.6% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
|
I don’t understand “controlled clinical trial setting”. Does this mean as part of a research investigation, or with careful clinical monitoring where everything else is controlled? |
PICU |
NO EVIDENCE THAT IMPROVES OUTCOME |
PICU N |
yes but realistically, evidence-base for use is poor |
Neuro S |
Mild hypothermia to 35 deg C |
PICU |
normothermia = current standard |
(v) subtemporal decompression should ideally be used in a controlled clinical trial setting only
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
73.3% |
20% |
Excluded |
Position |
Comments |
|
I don’t understand “controlled clinical trial setting”. Does this mean as part of a research investigation, or with careful clinical monitoring where everything else is controlled? |
Neuro S |
Do you mean “decompressive craniectomy” (diagram explaining that subtemporal decompression is a small flap). Not good evidence for this |
PICU |
depends on local neuroSx |
Neuro |
Or a more complete decompression |
(vi) deep barbiturate sedation should ideally be used in a controlled clinical trial setting only
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
37.5% |
31.3% |
Excluded |
Position |
Comments |
|
I don’t understand “controlled clinical trial setting”. Does this mean as part of a research investigation, or with careful clinical monitoring where everything else is controlled? |
Metab |
Widely used , safe in my experience |
PICU |
USED AT THE END OF ALGORHYTHM FOR TREATMENT OF RAISED ICP |
Neuro |
I think that the clinical experience with it is very considerable and I would be unhappy to proscribe it outside a trial |
Neuro S |
Clinically useful when all else failing |
PICU |
will usually follow 1st/2nd line management and needs eeg/cfam support |