PAEDIATRIC ALTERED CONSCIOUS LEVEL GUIDELINE

HOME

AIMS

SCOPE

CLINICAL QUESTIONS

EVIDENCE-BASED SEARCH

DELPHI PROCESS

RECOMMENDATIONS

COMMENTS

GUIDELINE DEVELOPMENT GROUP

DRAFT GUIDELINE

 

DELPHI PROCESS

 

 

Round one

 

11. Raised intracranial pressure

 

Statement 11a (Raised intracranial pressure recognition and initial management)

 

Intracranial pressure is related to cerebral perfusion pressure by the following equation:

            Cerebral perfusion pressure = mean arterial pressure – intracranial pressure

 

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

93.9%

6.1%

Included

 

 

Position

Comments

PICU

It is CPP = mean BP – mean ICP    

Neuro

This is an estimate of the CPP used in practice. It may not represent the CPP at the microvascular level.

 

Statement 11b

 

Raised intracranial pressure can be defined clinically by the presence of 2 or more of the following signs:

            Reduced conscious level (being Unrousable or GCS < 9)

            Abnormal pattern of respiration (hyperventilation, irregular ventilation or apnoeas)

            Abnormal pupils (unilateral or bilateral dilated pupils or unreactive pupils)

            Abnormal posture (decorticate or decerebrate posture or complete flaccidity)

            Abnormal doll’s eye (oculocephalic) response or caloric (oculovestibular) response

 

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

83.3%

6.7%

Included

 

Position

Comments

Paed

Bradycardia and hypertension could be included ?

 

There are other explanations for these findings

Neuro

These do not DEFINE ICP but certainly make it likely

ED P

Seems sensible, although I don’t know how many of the criteria you need

Neuro S

Several of the above could theoretically occur in brainstem ischaemia in the absence of raised ICP but this is unlikely in the paediatric age group

Endo

1. and one or more of the others

Paed

however not all signs may be present and clinical situation, eg trauma, may complicate picture

PICU

Abn of range of eye movement esp increase gaze may be more subtle early sign of raised ICP

Paed

caloric response not to be done by inexperienced doctors

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statement 11c

 

If raised intracranial pressure is suspected, then the child should undergo the following treatments:

 

(i) Position the patient’s head in the midline

 

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

86.7%

0%

Included

 

 

 

Position

Comments

ED P

May help, won’t cause harm!

ED

I’m not sure of the relevance of this – am I missing something? Isn’t that where we usually position the head??

Paed

Don’t know that but makes sense

PICU

may not always be easy to sustain

 

Statement 11c

 

If raised intracranial pressure is suspected, then the child should undergo the following treatments:

 

(ii) Angle the patient head up at 20 degrees above the horizontal

 

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

88.5%

0%

Included

 

 

Position

Comments

PICU

20-30 degrees

ED

If the child has sustained trauma, the spine should remain immobilised, ie the whole trolley should be at a slope of 20 degrees to the horizontal, not angled midway

ED

Outside my expertise and usually managed by PICU / Anaesthetists

PICU

10-30 deg advised from variety – difficult in active patient

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(iii) Sedate, intubate and ventilate the patient to maintain the PaCO2 between 4.0 and 5.0 kPa

 

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

64%

24%

Discussed in round 2

 

Position

Comments

Paed

Need lower co2

ED

I don’t know if there is a standard regarding sedating and ventilating.

Neuro

Not in all patients, certainly not in all suspected patients

Radiol

Yes but don’t know gas levels

Neuro S

4.0 – 4.5 would be my ideal

Endo

4.0-4.5?

Paed

BUT beware the DKA child with spontaneous pCO2 <2 – an increase to 4 precipitate coning

PICU

May be required. IC decision. PaCO2 4-4.5 initially

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(iv) Sedate, intubate and ventilate the patient to maintain the PaCO2 below 4.0 kPa

 

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

29.2%

66.7%

Excluded

 

 

Position

Comments

Paed

But should also define lower limit ? 3kPa to avoid people overdoing it

 

hyperventilate only if other measures have failed to bring ICP down

Neuro

There is a danger of causing cerebral ischaemia

Neuro

not always necessary, do you want to measure the pressure first? Bolt?

Paed

Though this was too low now?

Neuro S

Too low risk ischaemia

Endo

?above 3.5 ie 3.5-4.5

Paed

BUT beware the DKA child with spontaneous pCO2 <2 – an increase to 4 precipitate coning

Paed

occasionally required acutely to reduce pressure

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(v) the patient should be paralysed with muscle relaxing agents

 

 

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

60%

20%

Discussed in round 2

 

Position

Comments

PICU

only if tight control of C02 needed

Neuro

Depends on the situation; sometimes appropriate

Neuro

not always necessary

Neuro S

Not crucial initially

Endo

Need to observe movements if possible

Paed

in ICU setting

PICU

never routinely

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(vi) Administer a dose of 1g / kg of intravenous mannitol

 

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

50%

19.2%

Discussed in round 2

 

Position

Comments

 

depends on cause of raised ICP

Metab

0.5 Gm/kg IV

Neuro

Depends on response to other measures. Often appropriate, but certainly not always necessary

ED P

Not sure about dose (?0.5 g/kg) also some units prefer 3% saline

ED

If  the child has an intracranial bleed amenable to surgical decompression and / or in consultation with a neurosurgical team

ED P

If proven, not just suspected

Neuro S

0.5g/kg probably adequate

Paed

D/W neurosurgeons

Paed

only if P.U.s

PICU

may be required but not automatically, often used with frusemide if given

Paed

I discuss with neurosurgeons/neurologists as various places have different policies

Neuro

If not in renal failure and intracerebral haematoma excluded; 0.25-0.5g may work just as well

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(vii) Administer a dose of 5ml / kg of 3% sodium chloride (“hypertonic saline”)

 

 

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

25%

41.7%

Excluded

 

 

Position

Comments

PICU

if mannitol produced no response

Neuro

I don’t think the evidence base is strong enough to routinely recommend hypertonic saline

ED P

Cant remember dose

ED P

If proven, not just suspected

Paed

Never heard of it!

Neuro S

Not something I’ve seen used and don’t like the idea

Endo

Not in my experience

PICU

may be required. not usually both mannitol and 3% saline. duration of bolus if advised needs to be given. some would give over 60 mins other 180 mins

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(viii) Maintenance fluid should be administered at 100% of normal

 

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

26.9%

50%

Discussed in round 2

 

 

Position

Comments

PICU

if normal saline used

Neuro

Depends upon the volume status of the child and the BP

Paed

it should be ideally 2/3 maintenance

ED

Depends on intravascular filling and hydration

ED P

May get SIADH

Neuro

Unless signs of being overloaded

Metab

Assuming shock has been treated by this stage…

Endo

If shock present?

PICU N

Yes, but need a lot more detail regarding why ICP raised

PICU

rarely 100% usual about 70%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statement 11c

 

If raised intracranial pressure is suspected, then the child should undergo the following treatments:

 

(ix) Maintenance fluid should be administered at 70% of normal

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

68%

12%

Discussed in round 2

 

Position

Comments

 

Occasinally less depenbding on other factors eg renal function

 

Neuro

Depends upon the volume status of the child and the BP

PICU N

need to maintain CPP therefore need to keep fluids at 100% initially

Paed

at maximum

Neuro S

Old fashioned

Endo

But supporting perfusion

PICU

usually

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(x) Maintenance fluids should not be hypotonic

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

100%

0%

Included

 

 

Position

Comments

Neuro S

Ideally use saline/saline dex mix

 

 

(xi) Maintenance fluids should be 0.45% saline and dextrose (with 20 – 40mmol/l potassium if required) initially

 

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

34.8%

39.1%

Discussed in round 2

 

Position

Comments

PICU N

Need more patient details

Neuro

Depends upon the fluid status of the child

 

 

 

 

 

(xii) Maintenance fluids should be 0.9% saline (with 20 – 40mmol/l potassium if required) initially

 

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

62.5%

16.7%

Discussed in round 2

 

Position

Comments

PICU N

Need more patient details

Paed

Might need to add glucose especially for younger children

Neuro

monitor blood sugars, pending electrolyte results

ED

Depends on other local policies ie protocols for glucose/ stage of treatment reached

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(xiii) Arrange for patient transfer to a paediatric intensive care unit

 

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

93.9%

3.0%

Included

 

Position

Comments

PICU N

If necessary - Need more details

Neuro

If intubated and ventilated yes

Endo

…with neurosurgical facility

Paed

Neurosugical centre with PICU

PICU

ideally

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(xiv) Ensure the results of all the core investigations performed are reviewed, and consider further tests if the cause of the raised intracranial pressure is not diagnosed. (“core investigations performed” will be defined as the investigations agreed upon in Statement 7d; “further tests” will be defined as the investigations agreed upon in statements 7e)

 

 

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

100%

0%

Included

 

Position

Comments

PICU

time scale of results being available would help – with 30min reasonable

 

 

 

 

Statement 11d

 

Patients with suspected raised intracranial pressure should have invasive intracranial pressure monitoring performed if: (the mode of “invasive intracranial pressure monitoring” will be addressed later)

 

(i) the patient does not improve after initial intracranial pressure lowering measures have been implemented (“intracranial pressure lowering measures” will be defined by the treatments agreed upon in statement 11c)

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

63.6%

13.6%

Excluded

 

 

Position

Comments

Paed

Depends a little on availability

ED

seems appropriate but the evidence that monitoring alters outcome does not exist

Neuro

It very much depends on the cause of the raised ICP

ED P

This would be dealt with by centre we have referred to

ED P

If high suspicion

ED

Depends on cause

Endo

Ideally

PICU N

If severe enough – see neuro team

PICU

poor indication. no evidence to my knowledge

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(ii) the patient has cerebral oedema on CT scan

 

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

35%

35%

Excluded

 

 

 

Position

Comments

Neuro

Depends on cause

ED P

This would be dealt with by centre we have referred to

Neuro

not if patient improves

PICU N

neuro team

Paed

Neurosurgeon

Neuro S

Depends on history/level of GCS/other scan findings eg GCS>10 with focal contusion and oedema may be best woken up to be assessed.

Global oedema from asphyxia there may be no point in ICP monitoring a lethal brain injury

Endo

Not sure seeing it makes a difference

PICU

not an indication

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(iii) the patient is hypertensive (a mean arterial pressure above the 95th centile for age)

 

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

31.6%

42.1%

Excluded

 

 

 

Position

Comments

PICU

no

Endo

As CPP more difficult to assess

Paed

Neurosurgeon

ED P

Start antihypertensives

PICU N

neuro team

Neuro

not if patient improves

Neuro

I don’t think this is an important criterion for deciding on pressure monitoring

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(iv) the patient has a raised plasma ammonia level

 

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

14.3%

42.9%

Excluded

 

Position

Comments

PICU N

neuro team

Neuro

dpends on the level…lower ammonia level first

Paed

?what

Neuro S

Depends on clinical condition

PICU

no

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statement 11e

 

(i) In the acute setting, the most appropriate method of monitoring intracranial pressure is by inserting :

 

(a) an intraventricular catheter

 

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

37.5%

62.5%

Excluded

 

 

Position

Comments

ED

I’m no expert but I think these are used

ED

allows access to CSF but is technically more difficult and risks further infection

Neuro

If the ventricles are dilated, it may be a reasonable approach

ED P

Would not be doing this

Neuro

Nice in theory – in practice expertise amongst junior neurosurgical staff (and indeed many consultants) minimal

Metab

Depends on the setting: this is what we have easiest access to, performed by either a general surgeon, or by a physician-neurologist

PICU

CATHETER THAT ALLOWS DRAINAGE OF CSF IS IDEAL

Neuro S

Invasive, infection risk, though accurate and allows therapeutic tapping of fluid

Neuro

Ventricle are often compressed making insertion difficult

PICU

may help esp if spaces drainable

Neuro

If the surgeon can get one in…

 

Statement 11e

 

(i) In the acute setting, the most appropriate method of monitoring intracranial pressure is by inserting :

(b) a subarachnoid screw or bolt

 

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

56.3%

31.3%

Excluded

 

 

Position

Comments

ED

depends on availability of kit and is technically easier

Metab

We don’t have easy access to neurosurgery, which isn’t on-site

PICU

AS CAN BE PERFORMED BY NEUROSURGEON OR INTENSIVIST ON PICU

Neuro

Parenchymal bolt

ED

I’m no expert but I think these are used

Endo

Only experience I have!

Neuro

No data

Neuro S

Old fashioned

PICU

“usual” method

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(c) an epidural sensor

 

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

33.3%

50%

Excluded

 

Position

Comments

ED

potential risk of EDH if clotting is abnormal

Metab

Not available to us at this centre

Neuro

No data

Neuro S

But I think you mean subdural sensor as in Codman neurosensor (epidural placement is very inaccurate

PICU

not

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(ii) In the acute setting, the choice of intracranial pressure monitoring device should be determined by the neurosurgeon performing the procedure

 

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

72%

0%

Excluded

 

 

Position

Comments

PICU

most in the UK now use intraparenchymal devices

Neuro

If he understands the physiology

Metab

In consultation with Paed neurol/intensivists and according to their individual experiences

Neuro S

Monitoring devices and compatibilities will vary from unit to unit

PICU

helped by guidelines!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statement 11f

 

Patients with an intracranial pressure monitoring device in situ must also have invasive blood pressure monitoring to calculate the cerebral perfusion pressure

 

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

80%

0%

Included

 

 

 

Position

Comments

PICU

generally

Neuro S

In paediatric age range CPPs are less well researched than in adult

ED

Tho’ I have little experience of this I would support this

Neuro

This is good practice, but there is on going debate about whether ICP or perfusion pressure should be followed

Neuro

This is preferable but not essential

 

seems sensible, but evidence that ICP monitoring effects outcome is awaited

 

Statement 11g

 

Cerebral perfusion pressure should be maintained above 60 mmHg with the PaCO2 in the normal range

 

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

76.9%

0%

Included

 

 

Position

Comments

PICU N

For some patients PaCO2 at the lower end of normal is required to maintain stability

PICU

This value is age dependent

PICU

DEPENDS ON AGE OF CHILD

Neuro

The critical limits of CPP probably vary with age, but are unknown

Neuro

No data

Neuro

This is an appropriate level in older children but may be too high for younger children. It can be dangerous to drive the heart to hard and it may be better, in some circumstances to accept a lower perfusion pressure (say above 50). Ceratinly the Pa CO2 should be kept normal

Neuro S

Reasonable target for older kids.

Bob Minns in Edinburgh (Royal Hosp for Sick Children – paed neurology) has recently looked at different targets for ages – I think 50, 55, 60 were the figures he came up with when I last heard him talk at European Soc for Paed Neurosurgery 2004

Metab

This sounds somewhat high to me – we found poor prognosis if <40 – other say norm=50. But best if can be >60

PICU

age dependent (local guide and 1st guess = <1 yr 40; 1-3 yr 50; 3+ 60)

 

 

Statement 11h

 

To maintain an adequate cerebral perfusion pressure :

 

(i) inotropic support may be required

 

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

96.8%

0%

Included

 

Position

Comment

PICU

usual requirement = not inotrope but inoconstrictor (noradrenaline)

 

 

(ii) further doses of mannitol may be used

 

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

84%

0%

Included

 

Position

Comments

Neuro

Limited by osmality: a specialist (intensivist) decision

PICU N

but tend to be used just for crisis management

Paed

only once or twice?

Neuro S

Within limits – subsequent ones less effective

PICU

with careful monitoring

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(iii) further doses of 3% saline may be used

 

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

69.2%

15.4%

Excluded

 

 

Position

Comments

Neuro

a specialist (intensivist) decision

PICU

especially by slow infusion to target Na/Osmol – 160/320

 

 

 

 

 

(iv) hypothermia should ideally be used in a controlled clinical trial setting only

 

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

88.9%

5.6%

Included

 

 

 

Position

Comments

 

I don’t understand “controlled clinical trial setting”. Does this mean as part of a research investigation, or with careful clinical monitoring where everything else is controlled?

PICU

NO EVIDENCE THAT IMPROVES OUTCOME

PICU N

yes but realistically, evidence-base for use is poor

Neuro S

Mild hypothermia to 35 deg C

PICU

normothermia = current standard

 

 (v) subtemporal decompression should ideally be used in a controlled clinical trial setting only

 

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

73.3%

20%

Excluded

 

 

Position

Comments

 

I don’t understand “controlled clinical trial setting”. Does this mean as part of a research investigation, or with careful clinical monitoring where everything else is controlled?

 

Neuro S

Do you mean “decompressive craniectomy” (diagram explaining that subtemporal decompression is a small flap). Not good evidence for this

PICU

depends on local neuroSx

Neuro

Or a more complete decompression

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(vi) deep barbiturate sedation should ideally be used in a controlled clinical trial setting only

 

% Agree

% Disagree

Result

37.5%

31.3%

Excluded

 

 

Position

Comments

 

I don’t understand “controlled clinical trial setting”. Does this mean as part of a research investigation, or with careful clinical monitoring where everything else is controlled?

 

Metab

Widely used , safe in my experience

PICU

USED AT THE END OF ALGORHYTHM FOR TREATMENT OF RAISED ICP

Neuro

I think that the clinical experience with it is very considerable and I would be unhappy to proscribe it outside a trial

Neuro S

Clinically useful when all else failing

PICU

will usually follow 1st/2nd line management and needs eeg/cfam support