PAEDIATRIC ALTERED
CONSCIOUS LEVEL GUIDELINE |
|||||||||
Round one
7. Identifying the causes
of reduced consciousness
Statement 7a (Problem recognition)
The causes of reduced conscious level in children which can be suspected and treatment initiated within the first hour after presentation include:
(i) shock (hypovolaemic, distributive and cardiogenic) (definition of shock addressed later)
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
100% |
0% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Metab |
I find this series of questions rather pointless. Of course you CAN suspect and treat within one hour.One thing I am not clear about is whether the child is known to have a pre-existing illness. What matters is how important is it to treat quickly but that will depend in part on the severity |
(ii) sepsis (definition of sepsis addressed later)
% Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
97.1% |
2.9% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Metab |
I find this series of questions rather pointless. Of course you CAN suspect and treat within one hour.One thing I am not clear about is whether the child is known to have a pre-existing illness. What matters is how important is it to treat quickly but that will depend in part on the severity |
(iii) trauma
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
94.3% |
2.9% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Metab |
I find this series of questions rather pointless. Of course you CAN suspect and treat within one hour.One thing I am not clear about is whether the child is known to have a pre-existing illness. What matters is how important is it to treat quickly but that will depend in part on the severity |
(iv) raised intracranial pressure (definition of raised intracranial infection addressed later)
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
91.7% |
0% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Metab |
I find this series of questions rather pointless. Of course you CAN suspect and treat within one hour.One thing I am not clear about is whether the child is known to have a pre-existing illness. What matters is how important is it to treat quickly but that will depend in part on the severity |
Neuro |
Sometimes difficult to detect on initial exam |
(v) intracranial infection (definition of intracranial infection addressed later)
% Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
94.3% |
0% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Metab |
I find this series of questions rather pointless. Of course you CAN suspect and treat within one hour.One thing I am not clear about is whether the child is known to have a pre-existing illness. What matters is how important is it to treat quickly but that will depend in part on the severity |
Neuro S |
Meningitis I would include with sepsis as (. Empyemas/abscesses notoriously difficult: would not expect to diagnose in 1 hour |
Neuro |
Sometimes difficult to detect on initial exam |
(vi) metabolic disease (definition of metabolic disease addressed later)
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
76.5% |
8.8% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Metab |
I find this series of questions rather pointless. Of course you CAN suspect and treat within one hour.One thing I am not clear about is whether the child is known to have a pre-existing illness. What matters is how important is it to treat quickly but that will depend in part on the severity |
Neuro |
Inherited metabolic disease are often difficult to detect within the first hour |
|
Yes to hypoglycaemia, less so in practice for hyperammonaemia etc |
Paed |
Suspect, yes, precise identification will take much longer, supportive treatment only can be instituted |
ED P |
Although inborn errors of metabolism are an exception unless patient is known |
Neuro S |
Not all – hypoglycaemia/addison’s reasonable to think about in 1st hour |
ED P |
Can be suspected but not always possible to initiate treatment within 1 hour |
Paed |
hypoglycaemia – yes. Others highly unlikely to be treated within first hour |
Paed |
often very difficult to diagnose at time of presentation |
(vii) convulsions
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
84.8% |
2.9% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Metab |
I find this series of questions rather pointless. Of course you CAN suspect and treat within one hour.One thing I am not clear about is whether the child is known to have a pre-existing illness. What matters is how important is it to treat quickly but that will depend in part on the severity |
Neuro |
May subtle or electrographic seizures |
ED |
Should be included within the first hour too |
(viii) recovering from a previous convulsion (post-convulsion state)
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
84.4% |
3.0% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Metab |
I find this series of questions rather pointless. Of course you CAN suspect and treat within one hour.One thing I am not clear about is whether the child is known to have a pre-existing illness. What matters is how important is it to treat quickly but that will depend in part on the severity |
Neuro |
There are no distinguishing signs of this state |
Endo |
?what treatment, except airway support |
ED |
Should be included within the first hour too |
Statement 7b
There may be a group of children with reduced conscious level who have no specific clinical features to aid diagnosis within the first hour of initial presentation
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
100% |
0% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Paed |
Not uncommon scenario! |
Statement 7c
In children with reduced conscious level, concurrent management strategies need to be started to treat the different potential causes, whilst waiting for test results to confirm the most likely diagnosis
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
91.2% |
0% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
|
treat using the ABC criteria first then start with most clinically likely |
Paed |
Usually possible to exclude some of the potential causes clinically and treat for a smaller group of non excluded causes |
ED P |
Particularly managment of presumed encephalitis |
ED |
Not always! – perhaps should say “may need to be started”. |
Neuro S |
Especially antibiotics to cover sepsis/meningitis |
PICU |
certainly |
Paed |
But: care with too much fluid given initially. Too often a reflex response despite little evidence of circulatory failure |
Statement 7d
Children with reduced conscious level following a convulsion may be observed for 1 hour after the convulsion has stopped without any tests or treatments, if the patient is stable or improving.
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
57.6% |
32.6% |
Excluded |
Position |
Comments |
|
do a blood glucose |
ED |
Except for children with known epilepsy and no suspicion of hypoglycaemia, who are otherwise clinically stable or improving |
Neuro |
depends on context..if no fever/trauma, known epilepsy, usual postictal state |
Neuro |
This is one of the problems with the over-inclusive definition of non-traumatic coma at the start of the guideline |
|
Particularly if previous history of convulsions with uncomplicated recovery |
PICU |
They may have converted to non-convulsive status epilepticus |
Metab |
A strong response initiated by the expression “without any…..” Not even a capillary blood sugar…..? |
ED |
depending on the clinical background |
Neuro |
Only if this occurs in a child with a history of epilepsy or has features of a febrile convulsion |
Metab |
Needs blood glucose at least |
Neuro |
I have answered this assuming the impairement of conscious is not severe (GCS > 8) and on the basis of ‘improving’ rather than stable. These are different things. Following a seizure I would expect full recovery within 1 hour in a large majority |
ED P |
As long as the fit was not focal |
ED |
Depends on the reason for the fit eg head injury vs febrile vs hypoxic all require focussed Ix and Rx |
Neuro S |
If known seizure disorder (or a simple febrile fit where temperature has come down) |
PICU N |
So long as all the assessment bloods have been done and IV access is available |
ED N |
Depends if they are known to suffer from convulsions |
Radiol |
Always test for hypoglycaemia |
Endo |
Bit dependent on whether 1st fit, febrile, normoglycaemic etc |
Metab |
“Stable” is a word that can carry several different meanings! Please define…? – This worries me as, if we are wrong, the golden hour has passed |
Paed |
No tests? what about B.M. |
PICU |
depends on other features in history |
Paed |
Most should have a cap glucose checked as a minimum |
Neuro |
There are very few data in this area and the consequences of getting it wrong are very serious… |
Statement 7e (Core investigations for all)
All children with reduced conscious level (except those patients within one hour post convulsion, who are clinically stable) should be investigated with the following tests at presentation:
(i) Capillary glucose
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
100% |
0% |
Included |
Position |
Comment |
Biochem |
Need to define – do you mean a stix test / POCT |
Endo |
All children including within 1st hour post convulsion |
ED |
including post convulsion patients |
Neuro |
Why not do glucose in the post-convulsive? |
(ii) Blood glucose
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
83.3% |
2.8% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
ED |
where the capillary glucose is not normal |
Metab |
because of the unreliability of capillary glucose |
Paed |
Only would do it if the capillary glucose is low |
ED P |
Only to confirm abnormal cap glucose or if cap glucose not available |
ED |
I would accept blood glucose from the ABG result too |
Paed |
Only if capillary glucose abnormal |
Biochem |
Need to define – do you mean a laboratory glucose? |
Metab |
Yes, venepuncture blood |
Paed |
If cap glucose <2.6 or >8 |
PICU |
if cap glucose abn |
(iii) Urea
%
Agree |
% Disagree |
Result |
76.5% |
0% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Neuro |
Creatinine would be my preference |
ED |
Depends on Differential Diagnosis |
(iv) Electrolytes
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
97.1% |
0% |
Included |
Position |
Comment |
Biochem |
Need to define – do you mean Na, K, Ca |
(v) Liver function tests - aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase, alkaline phosphatase, albumin/protein
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
75.8% |
0% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
ED |
clinical history dependent |
ED |
Depends on DD |
Biochem |
? either or both AST /ALT . What about clotting? |
(vi) Plasma ammonia (taken from a venous or arterial sample)
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
69.7% |
6.1% |
Discussed
in round 2 |
Position |
Comments |
Paed |
Would exclude those with obvious diagnosis from history and examination eg trauma, intoxication |
Neuro |
Depends on context, clinical judgement. Some restrictions of availability out of hours in certain centres |
Renal |
Not always available out of hours! Needs to be free-flowing sample and to get to lab immediately |
ED P |
Not in trauma scenario |
ED |
Depends on DD |
Paed |
I would not do this at presentation |
Endo |
If no other cause apparent |
PICU |
2nd line |
(vii) Plasma lactate
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
33.3% |
16.7% |
Excluded |
Position |
Comments |
Paed |
Would exclude those with obvious diagnosis from history and examination eg trauma, intoxication– |
ED P |
If there is no other obvious cause, then yes |
ED P |
Not in trauma scenario |
Renal |
I think this really only applies to infants/young children in terms of investigations at presentation |
Metab |
Very non-specific, does not help in deciding on treatment |
ED |
Depends on DD |
Biochem |
“All” – will include some patients with known metabolic disease therefore no need to investigate for cause. Investigations limited to precipitation and management. Lactate - Depends on clinical presentation - if patient is shocked, poor periferal circulation, lactate will be increased and difficult to interpret therefore ?value |
endo |
If no other cause apparent |
Paed |
I would do this on my cap gas sample |
PICU |
2nd line |
(viii) Plasma amino acids
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
26.7% |
26.7% |
Excluded |
Position |
Comments |
Paed |
Would exclude those with obvious diagnosis from history and examination eg trauma, intoxication |
ED |
scenario dependent |
ED P |
If there is no other obvious cause, then yes |
Renal |
I think this really only applies to infants/young children in terms of investigations at presentation. |
ED P |
Not in trauma scenario |
ED |
Depends on DD |
Biochem |
Depends if cause of reduced consciousness is known ie may be a known disorder. If not then certainly agree |
Endo |
If no other cause apparent |
Paed |
Unlikely to take this on first blood sample |
PICU |
if not explained therefore 2nd line |
(ix) Blood gas (arterial/capillary/venous) – pH, pCO2, HCO3-
% Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
94.1% |
0% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
ED P |
Can be particularly useful for CO2 |
(x) Full blood count and film – Haemoglobin, white cell count and differential, platelet count
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
90.9% |
0% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Renal |
Again, some units (incl GOS when I was there) refuse to do out of hours FBC unless you can specifically justify it |
Paed |
Yes FBC, no to “film” unless abnormalities on diff count |
(xi) Coagulation studies – activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, fibrinogen, fibrinogen degredation products
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
53.1% |
9.4% |
Excluded |
Position |
Comments |
Paed |
Might omit if clear diagnosis from history /examination and not relevant to that diagnosis |
Neuro |
Not unless there are other features suggesting a coagulopathy |
Renal |
Only if sepsis suspected |
ED |
Depends on DD |
PICU N |
Yes if there are other clinical indicators |
Paed |
If suspecting sepsis. Maybe not in all at presentation |
Endo |
If bruising apparent/haemorrhage likely or confirmed |
PICU |
2nd line |
(xii) Blood culture
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
88.6% |
2.9% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Neuro |
Particularly if the child is febrile |
Paed |
Omit if not febrile and vlear diagnosis from history/examination |
ED |
Depends on DD |
PICU N |
Yes if there are other clinical indicators |
Endo |
As antibiotics likely to be started until cause known |
(xiii) C-reactive protein (if locally available)
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
48.6% |
8.6% |
Excluded |
Position |
Comments |
Paed |
Poor discriminator. Useful if clinically suspect sepsis as a baseline measurement |
Neuro |
The fact this investigation not available at all centres rather makes a nonsense of the statement? |
ED P |
Useful guide but must be used appropriately |
ED |
Depends on DD |
PICU N |
Yes if there are other clinical indicators |
Biochem |
What does “local” mean? ?on site ?out of hours |
Endo |
?may be useful for monitoring disease process |
(xiv) blood spot on Guthrie card
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
38.7% |
25.8% |
Excluded |
Position |
Comments |
Paed |
Useful if low glucose, suspect metabolic disease or no obvious diagnosis from history/examination |
ED P |
Something I suspect is not done often, and we are always forgetting! |
Renal |
Nice idea but I think it will take some time for A&E units to catch on |
Neuro |
for acetycarnitine? |
ED P |
Probably not necessary |
ED |
Depends on DD |
Endo |
If no other cause apparent |
Biochem |
What for? I presume acyl carnitines (same as for (viii)) Why blood spot and not plasma? |
Paed |
I wouldn’t do this (maybe a good idea?) |
Paed |
Age related |
PICU |
2nd line |
(xv) 1 - 2 ml of plasma to be separated, frozen and saved for later analysis if required
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
77.4% |
12.9% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Paed |
Useful if low glucose, suspect metabolic disease or no obvious diagnosis from history/examination |
ED P |
If no clear history of trauma / sepsis |
Neuro |
Sometimes, not always, particularly not with this very broad definition of coma |
Neuro |
Always useful in these cases |
ED |
Depends on DD |
Paed |
ideally |
Neuro S |
I’m sure one of (xv) or (xvi) should be saved |
Biochem |
?specify anticoagulant. ?need to save packed cells |
Paed |
Age related |
PICU |
2nd line |
(xvi) 1 - 2 ml of plain serum to be saved for later analysis if required
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
75% |
12.5% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Paed |
Useful if low glucose, suspect metabolic disease or no obvious diagnosis from history/examination |
ED P |
If no clear history of trauma / sepsis |
Neuro |
Sometimes, not always, particularly not with this very broad definition of coma |
ED |
Depends on DD |
Paed |
good for drug levels? |
Paed |
Age related |
PICU |
2nd line |
(xvii) Urine for organic acids, amino acids and orotic acid
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
51.4% |
14.3% |
Excluded |
Position |
Comments |
Neuro |
But urine should be saved for these |
ED P |
If no clear history, esp if parents related. Not in trauma/smoke inhalation |
Paed |
Useful if low glucose, suspect metabolic disease or no obvious diagnosis from history/examination– |
Neuro |
Only if a metabolic cause is suspected |
Renal |
See my comments about amino acids. Urine amino acids are only necessary to diagnose Fanconi syndrome or other amino acid transporter failure – eg Hartnup disease and are not relevant here. |
Neuro |
Sometimes, not always, particularly not with this very broad definition of coma |
ED |
Depends on DD |
Endo |
Store for possible analysis |
Biochem |
Depends if cause of reduced consciousness is known ie may be a known disorder. If not then certainly agree |
Paed |
not at presentation |
Paed |
Age related |
PICU |
perhaps have age limit <5yrs? |
(xviii) Urinalysis for ketones, dextrose, protein, nitrites and leucocytes
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
81.8% |
0% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Neuro |
To exclude an infection |
Renal |
Particularly important if the patient is hypertensive since this will be much quicker than U&E |
ED |
Depends on DD |
Endo |
“glucose” better |
(xix) Urine for culture
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
57.6% |
9.1% |
Excluded |
Position |
Comments |
Paed |
Only if dipstick positivie for leu and nitrites |
Renal |
Only relevant if urinalysis positive and/or young infant |
ED P |
Only if dipstick +ve |
ED |
Depends on DD |
PICU N |
Yes if there are other clinical indicators |
Paed |
dependent on urinalysis results |
PICU |
some will require |
Micro |
If urinalysis normal is this required? |
(xx) 10ml urine to be saved for later analysis if necessary
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
80% |
5.7% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Paed |
Unless diagnosis obvious from history/examination |
Renal |
Good idea. May be difficult to implement. Will need to be frozen though I think if OA analysis is later requested. |
ED |
Other tests to include urine antigens and drug screen |
ED P |
Esp if ?drug ingestion + parents consanguinous |
ED |
Depends on DD |
Endo |
Ie metabolic or toxicology |
Metab |
Does this mean principally for tandem MS or GC-MS? (this is how I’ve interpreted it) |
Biochem |
Less volume can be useful |
Paed |
ideally |
PICU |
generally helpful |
(xxi) Throat swab for bacterial culture
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
37.5% |
9.4% |
Excluded |
Position |
Comments |
ED P |
Only if clinically indicated ie not trauma/ingestion |
ED |
Depends on DD |
PICU N |
Yes if there are other clinical indicators |
Micro |
what exactly are we looking for in this situation – isolation of Neisseria meningitides may just indicate colonisation, I think it should be considered but not done in all cases. Group A streptococcus may be relevant if “shocked child” or if Haemophilus sp. if ? epiglottitis. After saying this it is relatively cheap we just need to be clear why it is being done. |
(xxii) Cranial Computed Tomography scan
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
51.4% |
20% |
Discussed
in round 2 |
Position |
Comments |
Paed |
Exclude the occasional case with clear diagnosis not needing scan eg known drug overdose |
Neuro |
Only if there are localising or laterlising signs |
Renal |
Not if other clearly identified cause not associated with raised ICP |
ED |
If cause unclear, or if trauma / intracranial bleed / raised intracranial pressure a possible cause. |
ED P |
Depends on clinical scenario. Can often wait until preliminary results available unless trauma |
Neuro |
Not in all |
Radiol |
While CT is important in the investigation of these children, it is relatively expensive and there are associated risks relating to ionising radiation. In the absence of acute trauma a CT should be a second line investigation once the acute medical causes have been excluded |
Paed |
Urgency depending upon the presence of 1) signs of raised ICP other than decreased conc level, 2) focal signs |
ED |
Depends on DD |
PICU N |
Need to be more specific for CT scan |
Neuro S |
Not unless neurological signs or unexplained deterioration in GCS while other obs satisfactory |
Endo |
If no other apparent cause eg hypoglycaemia |
Paed |
What?! |
Paed |
Provided there are no other diagnosis in clues |
PICU |
Needs better selection |
(xxiii) Cerebrospinal fluid should be collected if there are no contraindications for lumbar puncture. (Contraindications to lumbar puncture addressed later)
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
72.7% |
9.1% |
Discussed
in round 2 |
Position |
Comments |
Paed |
Unless diagnosis obvious from history and examination |
Neuro |
Not in all – there will be contexts in which it is clearly clinically irrelevant. Also depressed LOC a contraindication |
Metab |
Only if you see the need for doing the LP, of course |
Neuro |
Except in the case of simple febrile convulsions |
Renal |
I think in most cases this is more safely done cold |
ED |
If meningoencephalitis a possibility |
ED P |
Not in trauma, ingestion. Yes in sepsis |
Endo |
Probably no urgency in this situation |
ED |
Depends on DD. If there is an indication to do LP in first place |
PICU |
CT first |
Micro |
CSF pressure should be
determined |
(xxiv) Cerebrospinal fluid should be analysed initially for:
(a) Microscopy
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
100% |
0% |
Included |
Position |
Comment |
Micro |
Cell count |
(b) Gram staining
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
100% |
0% |
Included |
(c) Culture and sensitivity
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
100% |
0% |
Included |
(d) Glucose
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
96.9% |
0% |
Included |
(e) Protein
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
93.9% |
0% |
Included |
(f) PCR for herpes simplex and other viruses
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
84.4% |
3.1% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Neuro |
Need to specify which common viruses to be sure have been included in local “panel” e.g. HSV 1, HSV 2, VZV, HZV, enteroviruses |
Renal |
If clinical suspicion only |
Paed |
I don’t usually do this (maybe good idea) |
Neuro S |
Results available in reasonable timescale?? |
Endo |
Store for possible analysis |
Micro |
As long as clinical features are compatible, we try and use markers such as CSF WBC and other findings EEG/CT scan to guide most appropriate PCR investigations. E.g. bacterial PCRs if that is the likely diagnosis. |
Statement 7f
(i) As a non-sterile urine sample is required for many of the tests, a urine bag should be in situ as soon as the patient has had monitors attached
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
84.4% |
3.1% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
ED P |
Although not sent for MC&S, unless no other urine available (useful if negative) |
ED |
I think this depends on local policy and the reason for and length of decreased GCS. Clean catch vs bag issue |
PICU N |
Not always a priority |
Paed |
I want a sterile urine to start with as infection must be excluded |
Endo |
In young children |
PICU |
OK |
(ii) If a urine sample has not been collected within an hour of presentation, the patient should be catheterised
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
46.9% |
28.1% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
ED |
If endotracheal intubation and ventilation required |
ED P |
Can wait a bit longer |
ED |
Depends on clinical context |
Paed |
not sure |
Neuro S |
Monitoring urine output too |
Endo |
If no inprovement in conscious level |
PICU |
not always. other intervention Ix 1st, USS bladder |
Paed |
?2-3 hours |
(iii) If a urine sample has not been collected within an hour of presentation, a patient under one year old should have a suprapubic aspiration of urine performed
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
28.1% |
37.5% |
Excluded |
Position |
Comments |
Paed |
Catheter as good, and may well need catheter anyway |
Neuro |
Only if infection is suspected |
Neuro |
I think a catheter would be as appropriate, possibly more in order to measure urine output |
ED P |
Catheter speciment just as good, although can be difficulties with this sometimes nd then SPA may be attempted (under U/S guidance if poss) |
Paed |
catheter if possible |
ED P |
Unlikely to change management. could wait longer or do in/out catheter |
Neuro |
depends…if you are going to catheterise…you can collect a sa,mple at the same time |
ED |
Depends on clinical context |
Paed |
not sure |
PICU |
not always. other intervention Ix 1st, USS bladder |
Statement 7g (Further investigations for some)
If no diagnosis is made after the first investigations have been reviewed, further tests to request include:
(i) Blood alcohol level
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
58.8% |
0% |
Discussed
in round 2 |
Position |
Comments |
Metab |
Comments Low glucose, high lactate often useful clues to EtOH ingestion in younger children |
Neuro |
Not clear whether you mean this should be considered (agreed) or always ordered if initial screen negative (disagree) |
Endo |
?all ages |
Paed |
usually obvious from breath |
ED P |
Dependent on situation |
Renal |
It would be unusual to cause impaired consciousness without a smell of alcohol on the breath |
ED |
Depending on clinical suspicion |
Neuro |
Comments depends on context |
ED |
I would suggest it ought to be done routinely in all over 12 years if decreased GCS and eg trauma |
Biochem |
Include in first investigations if history suggests |
Paed |
usually can smell / have Hx of alcohol |
PICU |
if suspected from Hx exam this 1st line |
(ii) Urine toxicology screen
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
100% |
0% |
Discussed
in round 2 |
Position |
Comments |
Neuro |
Not clear whether you mean this should be considered (agreed) or always ordered if initial screen negative (disagree) |
Biochem |
Include in first investigations if history suggests |
PICU |
look at pupils/sweatiness if so 1st line |
(iii) MRI (magnetic resonance imaging)
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
37.5% |
12.5% |
Discussed
in round 2 |
Position |
Comments |
ED P |
Consider |
Paed |
Would take neurology advice first |
ED P |
To consider- availability is a problem as will need referral |
Renal |
Isn’t going to be routinely available |
Radiol |
If the child has had a normal CT examination that has been reviewed by a consultant radiologist an MRI would be indicated. |
Neuro |
Only in selected cases |
Endo |
Not sure much to gain if previously well and normal CT |
ED |
Depends on clinical context |
Neuro S |
Not the first place I’d take a sick child – I’d have a CT at this stage |
PICU N |
Could be useful but I don’t know the specifics |
Paed |
of brain. |
Paed |
if CT not available |
PICU |
rarely required initially unless brainstem suspected / post fossa |
neuro |
If this is necessary, suggest it should include MR (or in fact CT) venography as the pickup from plain CT is low |
(iv) Cerebrospinal fluid Ziehl-Nielsen staining for tuberculosis if the initial microscopy is abnormal
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
62.1% |
0% |
Discussed
in round 2 |
Position |
Comments |
Metab |
Only if you very strongly suspect TBM. Requires high skill, and in the best hands may be negative in TBM. Certainly not to be ranked above viral culture /PCR in order of importance and doesn’t replace culture for TB |
Neuro |
A number of alternatives are available; I would be guided by the lab |
Neuro |
depends on CSF glucose/protein, history and findings |
ED P |
Can be very non-specific history + exam initially therefore need high index of suspicion |
ED |
Depends on clinical context |
Paed |
Consider. In Norwich TBM is rare +++ (no ethnic minorities) |
Micro |
This should be considered, in practice AAFB microscopy and TB PCR will usually both be performed, PCR is probably more sensitive but the AAFB smear will give you a more immediate answer. Sufficient volumes of CSF are also required, bearing in mind we may have already done the above investigations and the specimen may need to be separated to go to different laboratories. |
(v) Cerebrospinal fluid polymerase chain reaction for tuberculosis if the initial microscopy is abnormal
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
63.6% |
4.5% |
Discussed
in round 2 |
Position |
Comments |
ED |
Depends on clinical context |
Neuro |
Again no longer clear if we’re talking about “if clinical context suggests” or blanket recommendation for every child with a GCS<15 in whom initial investigations unhelpful |
Metab |
Is this more sensitive than culture for TB? |
Neuro |
depends on CSF glucose/protein, history and findings |
Paed |
As above (Consider. In Norwich TBM is rare +++ (no ethnic minorities)) PCR for meningococcus and herpes I would do first |
Paed |
not available locally |
Paed |
not available widely and results slow |
Micro |
This should be considered, in practice AAFB microscopy and TB PCR will usually both be performed, PCR is probably more sensitive but the AAFB smear will give you a more immediate answer. Sufficient volumes of CSF are also required, bearing in mind we may have already done the above investigations and the specimen may need to be separated to go to different laboratories. |
(vi) Cerebrospinal fluid amino acids
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
42.1% |
21.1% |
Discussed
in round 2 |
Position |
Comments |
ED |
Depends on clinical context |
Neuro |
Again no longer clear if we’re talking about “if clinical context suggests” or blanket recommendation for every child with a GCS<15 in whom initial investigations unhelpful. Do you mean further tests “to request” or “to consider requesting”? |
Neuro |
Only in selected cases |
ED P |
Be guided by local neurology opinion |
Neuro |
depends on history, findings and urine AA, OA and serum AA |
Paed |
Would take neurology advice |
Biochem |
“consider”! Depends on the clinical findings. Also consider CSF neurotransmitters |
Paed |
but need blood ammonia, gas etc |
PICU |
paired samples may be required |
(vii) Cerebrospinal fluid lactate
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
58.3% |
12.5% |
Discussed
in round 2 |
Position |
Comments |
Neuro |
Again no longer clear if we’re talking about “if clinical context suggests” or blanket recommendation for every child with a GCS<15 in whom initial investigations unhelpful. Do you mean further tests “to request” or “to consider requesting”? |
Metab |
Non-specifically raised in the acute situation |
Neuro |
Selected cases |
ED P |
Be guided by local neurology opinion |
Neuro |
depends on MRI and serum lactate |
Metab |
Comments In this scenario, interpretation may be impossible |
Endo |
?only if serum lactate abnormal in an unconscious child |
Biochem |
Consider at same time as CSF glucose |
ED |
Depends on clinical context |
Micro |
We have this in our first line investigations |
(viii) Serology for mycoplasma and other viruses
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
73% |
0% |
Discussed
in round 2 |
Position |
Comments |
Neuro |
if fever |
ED |
Depends on clinical context |
PICU |
|
Micro |
Some
authors have questioned the validity of mycoplasma serology, certainly some
of the reported cases in the literature had negative serology. If strongly
suspect mycoplasma, CSF for mycoplasma PCR may need to be considered. Please
note ureaplasma may cause CNS infection in neonates (usually prem.) |
(ix) Autoimmune screen
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
47.8% |
4.3% |
Discussed
in round 2 |
Position |
Comments |
ED |
Depends on clinical context |
Paed |
Would take neurology advice |
Metab |
If you suspect SLE, look specifically for this |
Renal |
Cerebral lupus / vasculitis I presume? An ESR would be a useful screening test before you embark on auto-antibodies |
Neuro |
as third line…thyroid antibodies, lupus etc |
Paed |
A positive dsDNA does not mean lupus! You need to suspect an autoimmune condition to request a screen |
Endo |
If inflammatory markers high ie ESR |
(x) Thyroid antibodies and thyroid function tests
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
40.7% |
11.1% |
Discussed
in round 2 |
Position |
Comments |
ED |
Depends on clinical context |
Renal |
I would have thought thyroid function alone would be sufficient initially |
Neuro |
as third line |
Paed |
TFTs yes, antibodies No |
Biochem |
Review newborn screening for hypothyroidism |
Endo |
Would expect other clinical findings ie weight change, abnormal heart rate. Only do antibodies if TFTs abnormal |
(xi) Thick and thin blood film, if recent foreign travel
%
Agree |
% Disagree |
Result |
90.0% |
3.3% |
Discussed
in round 2 |
Position |
Comments |
ED |
Depends on clinical context |
Neuro |
(But not to |
Metab |
Not unless febrile, surely |
ED P |
I would have this as one of the core investigations if there has been foreign travel as have been caught out before! |
Renal |
If fever present |
Paed |
malarial antibody is now our first line test |
(xii) Urgent electroencephalogram
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
78.6% |
3.6% |
Discussed
in round 2 |
Position |
Comments |
ED |
Depends on clinical context |
Paed |
Would take neurology advice |
Neuro |
Again no longer clear if we’re talking about “if clinical context suggests” or blanket recommendation for every child with a GCS<15 in whom initial investigations unhelpful. Do you mean further tests “to request” or “to consider requesting”? |
Neuro |
To exclude non-convulsive status |
ED P |
Again, entails transfer |
Renal |
Didn’t realise an EEG could be requested out of hours |
Neuro |
r/o non convulsive status epilepticus….degree of encephalopathy…clues to etiology |
Endo |
Esp if confusion persists or localised signs or icreased WCC in CSF |
ED P |
If suspicion of subclinical status |
Paed |
if remains unconscious, or fluctuating levels |
Statement 7h (Contraindications for lumbar puncture)
Contraindications for lumbar puncture include:
(i) a
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
20% |
43.3% |
Excluded |
Position |
Comments |
Paed |
Higher GCS ( eg 12-14) can be assessed on a case by case basis re signs of raised ICP |
Metab |
Not before brain imaging |
Neuro |
On its own it is not a sole contraindication |
ED P |
Relative CI |
Neuro |
do CT scan first |
PICU |
lower threshold =8 |
Paed |
depends on other Ix etc |
(ii) a
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
50.0% |
28.1% |
Discussed
in round 2 |
Position |
Comments |
Paed |
Again signs and symptoms of raised ICP should be sought |
Neuro |
do CT scan first |
ED |
Other signs may be more important – trend of GCS, focal neuro signs, BP etc |
Endo |
May be deferred |
Paed |
depends on other Ix etc |
(iii) a
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
73.3% |
16.7% |
Discussed
in round 2 |
Position |
Comments |
ED |
Other signs may be more important – trend of GCS, focal neuro signs, BP etc |
Paed |
Context specific. Certainly not soom after arrival in A and E . Can be done once safely intubated and stabilised on PITU |
Neuro |
do CT scan first |
Endo |
May be deferred |
Paed |
depends on other Ix etc |
(iv) a deteriorating
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
84.4% |
12.5% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
ED |
Other signs may be more important – trend of GCS, focal neuro signs, BP etc |
Paed |
Must scan first |
Paed |
after some period of observation |
(v) focal neurological signs
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
84.6% |
0% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Paed |
Must scan first |
Neuro |
New signs |
Neuro |
do CT scan first |
Neuro S |
Shifts are a real concern implying risk of herniation |
Paed |
CT first |
Neuro |
Depends on GCS |
(vi) a focal seizure
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
53.3% |
26.7% |
Discussed
in round 2 |
Position |
Comments |
Neuro |
do CT scan first |
Paed |
Must scan first |
Neuro |
Depends on situation. A fully recovered child who has had a complex febrile seizure may reasonably be LP’d |
Paed |
complex febrile convulsions (focal prolonged or recurrent) more frequently indicate meningitis. If neurology normal and GCS >12 I would LP) |
PICU |
until further assessed |
Neuro |
Depends on GCS |
(vii) a seizure lasting more than 10 minutes
% Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
53.3% |
26.7% |
Excluded |
Position |
Comments |
Paed |
If 10-30 mins assess on basis of other features eg ? raised ICP |
Neuro |
Until full consciousness is regained |
Paed |
complex febrile convulsions (focal prolonged or recurrent) more frequently indicate meningitis. If neurology normal and GCS >12 I would LP) |
Endo |
But could be deferred |
PICU |
not alone |
Paed |
until after signs of recovery |
Neuro |
Depends on GCS |
(viii) a seizure lasting more than 30 minutes
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
46.7% |
20% |
Discussed
in round 2 |
Position |
Comments |
Neuro |
Until full consciousness is regained |
Paed |
Scan first |
Neuro |
Ctscan first/exam |
Paed |
I would delay LP |
PICU |
would want more investigation |
Paed |
unless rapid improvement |
Neuro |
Depends on GCS |
(ix) agitation
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
30% |
40% |
Excluded |
Position |
Comments |
Paed |
Sort out agitation first |
ED P |
Partly as it would be practically difficult |
Neuro |
will be difficult |
Paed |
Meningitis ? |
Neuro S |
Common with meningeal irritation in early stages |
PICU |
until initial Ix clear +2nd/3rd line |
Neuro |
Depends on GCS |
(x) shock (definition addressed later)
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
81.3% |
6.3% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Paed |
Wait until stable |
Neuro |
stabilize first |
ED |
Treat the shock! |
Paed |
Yes if unstable, once shock corrected then LP |
Neuro |
Difficult Qu – as shock can be treated/corrected, then LP done |
ED N |
Depends on type of shock |
Endo |
Deferred until resuscitation |
Neuro |
Depends on GCS |
(xi) clinical evidence of systemic meningococcal disease
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
80.6% |
9.7% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Paed |
Unless perfectly stable |
PICU |
you don’t want to be doing an LP in someone with a coagulopathy, but the result will help with treatment, prognosis etc |
Renal |
Will need LP at some point but not at presentation |
Neuro |
not necessary….could just treat |
Paed |
delay because of clotting |
Radiol |
Blood culture and treat |
Neuro |
Depends on GCS |
(xii) a purpuric rash
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
60% |
23.3% |
Discussed
in round 2 |
Position |
Comments |
Paed |
Wait until stable and platelet count clotting etc reviewed |
Neuro |
Depends on the cause of the purpuric rash ?meningococcal, ?low platlets ? effects of vomiting, etc, etc |
Neuro |
await clotting/platelet count first…no hurry..could treat for meningococcal in mean time |
Radiol |
Blood cultur and treat |
Endo |
May be deferred |
Paed |
check clotting first |
Neuro |
Depends on GCS |
(xiii) pupillary dilation (unilateral or bilateral)
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
86.7% |
0% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Paed |
Scan first |
Metab |
Badly phrased I feel. If unilateral dilation, I would not LP |
PICU |
AVOID IN ANY LOCALISING SIGNS |
ED P |
Yes if unilateral, no if bilateral |
Metab |
Surprised that bi- and unilateral linked in Qu stem. Unilateral pupil dilalation may well be CI |
PICU |
would do after 1st line OK |
(xiv) papillary reaction to light impaired or lost
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
93.1% |
3.4% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Metab |
Certainly not to be done unless you are certain there is not likely to be raised ICP or a mass lesion, but could still be done later if these are excluded |
Paed |
Scan first |
(xv) bradycardia (heart rate less than 60 beats per minute)
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
90% |
0% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
PICU |
heart rate/blood pressure suggestive of raised intracranial pressure-LP contraindicated |
Neuro |
Level depends on age |
Paed |
may indicate raised ICP |
Metab |
Might depend on its cause – assume not Cushing’s effect |
ED N |
Depends on normal resting HR +/- signs of shock |
Neuro S |
(xv) and (xvi): these 2 might be “classical indicators of raised ICP but are very late signs – if seen together that’s concerning – either bradycardia or hypertension alone when GCS is reasonable is less worrying. |
(xvi) hypertension (mean blood pressure above 95th centile for age)
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
85.7% |
0% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Paed |
may indicate raised ICP |
(xvii) abnormal breathing pattern
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
83.9% |
3.2% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Paed |
Intubate and stabilise first |
Paed |
Not if O2 good, protecting airway, otherwise OK |
Metab |
Intubate – control airway, LP later |
PICU |
other interventions more appropriate |
(xviii) an abnormal doll’s eyes response (abnormal response is random movement or no movement relative to the eye socket on turning head to left or right, or no upward gaze on flexing neck)
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
100% |
0% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Metab |
Again timing a factor here. Early on: strongly agree strongly. Later, may reflect irreversible damage so could be done without risk |
Neuro S |
Should get a scan first – if cisterns open proceed to LP |
(xix) abnormal posture
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
86.7% |
6.7% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Neuro |
Depends on posture |
Paed |
posturing in meningitis |
(xx) signs of raised intracranial pressure (signs of raised intracranial pressure defined later)
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
100% |
0% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Neuro S |
Need a scan |
Paed |
as detailed above |
Statement 7i
(i) A normal CT scan does not exclude acute raised intracranial pressure.
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
94.1% |
2.9% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
PICU |
many papers published on this |
Neuro S |
But absence of a mass lesion / shift and presence of communication cisterns makes LP safe |
Paed |
but may be helpful if focal new features |
(ii) A normal CT scan should not influence the decision to perform a lumbar puncture if other contraindications are present.
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
81.3% |
9.4% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
Paed |
Depends on whether scan was purely to look for raised ICP or not eg if scanned because focal fit nad nil focal seen nor raised ICP and child stable, might go ahead |
Neuro S |
But absence of a mass lesion / shift and presence of communication cisterns makes LP safe |
(iii) The decision to perform a lumbar puncture in a child with reduced conscious level should be made by an experienced paediatrician, who has examined the child. (The definition of “an experienced paediatrician” should be decided by individual departments when the guideline is implemented at a local level)
%
Agree |
%
Disagree |
Result |
94.1% |
0% |
Included |
Position |
Comments |
ED |
could be a paed. A+E consultant too! If experienced/trained to make decision. |
Neuro |
I think clear guidelines can be drawn up to help juniors make this decision |
Paed |
SpR (in discussion with consultant)or above |