PAEDIATRIC ALTERED CONSCIOUS LEVEL GUIDELINE

HOME

AIMS

SCOPE

CLINICAL QUESTIONS

EVIDENCE-BASED SEARCH

DELPHI PROCESS

RECOMMENDATIONS

COMMENTS

GUIDELINE DEVELOPMENT GROUP

DRAFT GUIDELINE

 

DELPHI PROCESS

 

 

Round two

 

9. Sepsis

 

9b) (iii) A child with a clinical diagnosis of sepsis should be considered for the following additional investigations:

 

(a) chest X-ray

 

 

Position

Comment

Paed

a chest xray only if there is a resp symptoms or a pulmonary focus of the sepsis is considered

Metab

– clue to various diagnoses incl NAI, TB, primary CVS prob with sec brain comlications

 

Agreed

Neither agree nor disagree

Disagreed

90%

10%

0

 

 

(b) throat swab

 

 

 

Position

Comment

Micro

Useful to pick up carriage of Neisseria meningitides if PCR etc negative or serogroup not determined, unlike other investigations likely to be affected by antibiotics and therefore cannot be reliably repeated later in course of illness, also non-invasive investigation. On the down side carriage does not equal disease.

Endo

?viral or bacterial, preferably both

 

Agreed

Neither agree nor disagree

Disagreed

86%

14%

0

 

 

(c) urine culture, if urinalysis positive for leucocytes and / or nitrites

 

 

 

Agreed

Neither agree nor disagree

Disagreed

100%

 

 

 

 

(d) lumbar puncture

 

 

Position

Comment

Neuro

If  impaired level of conscious or other features suggestive of CNS infection

Paed

Should be considered in the absence of agreed complications and patient must be stable

Paed

Not while unconscious

Micro

Only reliable way to exclude meningitis, may be useful in conforming diagnosis or showing other alternative causes of infection such as TB meningitis or HSE not picked up clinically

Endo

haven’t we covered this? depends on contraindications and timing is important

Metab

– as long as no CI

 

Agreed

Neither agree nor disagree

Disagreed

78%

15%

7%

 

 

(e) PCR from blood for meningococcus and pneumococcus

 

 

Position

Comment

Renal

Is this routinely available?

Micro

PCR for meningococcus is useful I am less convinced about pneumococcal PCR on blood as false positives in healthy children are well documented, PCR on CSF for both meningococcus and pneumococcus is helpful

 

Agreed

Neither agree nor disagree

Disagreed

100%

 

 

 

 

(g) skin swab, if areas of inflammation are present

 

 

Position

Comment

Renal

Better is microscopy of skin scrapings

Renal

What do you mean by inflammation?

 

Agreed

Neither agree nor disagree

Disagreed

89%

7%

4%

 

 

(h) joint aspiration, if signs of septic arthritis are present

 

 

Position

Comment

Paed

Child should be fully assessed with appropaiate imaging and clinical evaluation

Renal

Most paediatricians would not be competent to do this

Micro

PCR on joint fluid sometimes helpful too

 

Agreed

Neither agree nor disagree

Disagreed

96%

0

4%

 

 

(i) a thick and thin film for malarial parasites if foreign travel to endemic area

 

 

Position

Comment

Micro

This is a mandatory investigation, may need to give a time interval as the above statement would suggest any travel to an endemic area. There are a long list of other neurological, conditions which could affect children (although less likely than adults as I assume they would go less off the beaten track) I think such cases should be discussed with a microbiologist or paediatric/adult ID unit or one of the Schools of Tropical Medicine, I would hope each would be aware of the limitations of their expertise in this area.

 

Agreed

Neither agree nor disagree

Disagreed

100%

 

 

 

 

(j) intracranial imaging, if no other source of infection determined

 

 

Position

Comment

Radiol

Not unless cranial signs – CT is a poor tool as a ‘fishing’ investigation

Radiol

intracranial imaging in these cases should only be undertaken after discussion with a consultant radiologist about the next appropriate imaging investigation given the results of all other investigations and the childs clinical state.

Paed

In earlier section I indicated that this should be done even if if other source identified.

Micro

Important to exclude Brain Abscess

 

Agreed

Neither agree nor disagree

Disagreed

90%

4%

6%